The clinical problem of unrelieved pain has received much attention over the previous decade with a major focus on cancer pain and acute postoperative pain. Organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Cancer Institute, the American Pain Society (APS), and others have addressed the previously neglected areas of pain assessment, pharmacologic treatment, and the knowledge and attitudes of health-care providers. Health-policy issues related to pain, including areas of cost, access to care, regulatory perspectives, and ethical and legal issues, have likewise been neglected. To explore the costs associated with pain, the following framework has been developed through the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) pain panel. This 13-point framework is an attempt to isolate specific cost issues, identify what is known in these areas, and address implications for future research. A brief synopsis of these 13 areas of cost analysis is provided including comments regarding work in progress by the panel and directions for future health-policy research related to pain management.

Clinicians are confronted with various and often conflicting sets of practice guidelines that direct provision of preventive care. This conflict among guidelines is detrimental to the delivery of preventive care and creates a major barrier to improving these services. This study used a systematic approach to reach consensus among health plan medical directors on clinical preventive services (CPS) guidelines. A consistent set of 17 CPS guidelines was identified that all health plans could endorse as being a priority for implementation. This approach provides a template for competing health plans nationwide to reach consensus on guidelines that support clinicians in the delivery of CPS.

In this exploratory study, a random sample of nurses from nine nursing specialties was surveyed to identify which Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) coded procedures they perform and how frequently they perform them. CPT codes are used universally to file claims for physician payment. The sample included 74 school nurses, 67 enterostomal nurses, 53 family nurse practitioners, 43 critical care nurses, 43 oncology nurses, 40 rehabilitation nurses, 39 orthopaedic nurses, 34 nephrology nurses and 25 nurse-midwives. Specific questionnaires were developed for each specialty with codes identified by expert panels. The number of CPT codes ranged from 233 for family nurse practitioners to 58 for school nurses. The mean number of coded services performed by individual respondents ranged from 79 (FNP) to 18 (school nurses); individual respondents performed 0-162 codes. Supervision by physicians was very infrequent. Charges to Medicare in 1988 for the coded services included in the survey were $22,793,427.34 (aggregate allowable charges). The study provides some documentation of the degree to which nurses perform the same services and procedures for which physicians are being paid. If policy makers are serious about reaching innovative solutions to the problems of quality, access and cost, everything must be "on the table," including the contributions of nurses.