Background Esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), is widely used to treat acid-related disorders, but it has short plasma half-life which can cause insufficient gastric acid suppression, such as nocturnal acid breakthrough. A new dual delayed-release (DR) formulation of esomeprazole (Esomezol DR), was developed to extend the duration of gastric acid suppression. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PDs) of esomeprazole for the DR formulation compared to a conventional enteric-coated (EC) formulation (Nexium) in healthy male subjects. Methods Two randomized, open-label, multiple-dose, two-way crossover studies with esomeprazole 20 mg and 40 mg were conducted. Subjects received the DR formulation or the EC formulation once daily for 7 days in each period with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the 1st dose, and 24-hour intragastric pH was continuously monitored before the 1st dose as baseline and after the 1st and the 7th dose. Results In 20 mg and 40 mg dose groups, 38 and 44 subjects completed the study, respectively. The DR formulation exhibited the dual-release pattern of esomeprazole, resulting in more sustained plasma concentration–time profiles compared to the EC formulation. The systemic exposure of esomeprazole for the DR formulation was comparable to that for the EC formulation, showing the similar area under the plasma concentration–time curve. The 24-hour gastric acid suppression was also similar between the two formulations, while the inhibition during night-time (22:00–06:00) showed a better tendency in the DR formulation. Conclusion The sustained exposure of esomeprazole in the DR formulation led to well-maintained and higher acid inhibition compared to the EC formulation, especially during the night-time. These results suggest that the DR formulation can be an alternative formulation to the conventional EC formulation, expecting the potential of relieving nocturnal acid-related symptoms.

An extended-release (ER) fixed-dose combination (FDC) of tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg was developed due to the demand for varying dosages. This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) for two tablets of the new developed tramadol 37.5 mg/acetaminophen 325 mg ER FDC (DW-0920, Wontran Semi ER ® ) as test formulation compared to one tablet of the tramadol 75 mg/acetaminophen 650 mg ER FDC (DW-0919, Wontran ER ® ) as reference formulation. A randomized, open-label, 2-way crossover study was conducted in 30 healthy subjects. Subjects were orally administered one of 2 formulations followed by an alternate formulation with a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected up to 36 hours post-dose. Plasma concentrations of tramadol and acetaminophen were determined using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric method. The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of test formulation to reference formulation were calculated for the maximum plasma concentration (C max ) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the last measurable time point (AUC last ). The PK profiles of 2 formulations were comparable. The GMRs (90% CI) of C max and AUC last for tramadol were 1.086 (1.047–1.127) and 1.008 (0.975–1.042), respectively. The corresponding values for acetaminophen were 0.956 (0.897–1.019) and 0.986 (0.961–1.011), respectively. All the values were within the bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. Two tablets of DW-0920 were comparable to one tablet of DW-0919. The DW-0920 may be used for optimal pharmacotherapy for pain control with a lower dose. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01606059

Background Dapagliflozin formate (DAP-FOR, DA-2811), an ester prodrug of dapagliflozin, was developed to improve the stability and pharmaceutical manufacturing process of dapagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR compared to those for dapagliflozin propanediol monohydrate (DAP-PDH, Forxiga) in healthy subjects. Methods This was an open-label, randomized, single-dose, two-period, two-sequence crossover study. The subjects received a single dose of DAP-FOR or DAP-PDH 10 mg in each period, with a 7-day washout. Serial blood samples for PK analysis were collected up to 48 hours after a single administration to determine plasma concentrations of DAP-FOR and dapagliflozin. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental method and compared between the two drugs. Results In total, 28 subjects completed the study. DAP-FOR plasma concentrations were not detected in all of the blood sampling time points except for one time point in one subject, and the corresponding DAP-FOR plasma concentration in the subject was close to the lower limit of quantification. The mean plasma concentration–time profiles of dapagliflozin were comparable between the two drugs. The geometric mean ratios and its 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration–time curve of dapagliflozin for DAP-FOR to DAP-PDH were within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.80–1.25. Both drugs were well-tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse drug reactions. Conclusion The rapid conversion of DAP-FOR into dapagliflozin led to the extremely low exposure of DAP-FOR and comparable PK profiles of dapagliflozin between DAP-FOR and DAP-PDH. The safety profiles were also similar between the two drugs. These results suggest that DAP-FOR can be used as an alternative to DAP-PDH.