Vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) is a common infection of the female genital tract affecting 75% women at least once in their lifetime. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and potential risk factors associated with VVC and recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC). A prospective study of women with vaginitis symptoms was conducted over 2 years in the regional clinic of population and family education in Sfax. A discriminant analysis was used to evaluate the association between the incidence of Candida vaginitis and potential risk factors. Sporadic and recurrent VVC were documented respectively in 48% and 6.1%. The most frequent factors associated with positive Candida culture were employed women, uncontrolled diabetes, history of genital infection and intrauterine device contraception. Increased episode numbers of VVC and condom/spermicidal contraception were positively associated with recurrences. Candida albicans was the predominantly isolated species (76.3%) followed by Candida glabrata (19.3%). Infection with C. glabrata occurred in 34% and 17.5% of patients with RVVC and VVC respectively. The discriminant investigation had provided further insights into the basis for prevention and control of RVVC. Increased prevalence of C. glabrata in patients with RVVC and observed risk factors should be taken into consideration to achieve success in the management of this infection.
We investigated six microsatellite markers to type 85 unrelated and 118 related isolates of Candida glabrata from 36 patients. Three new markers were selected from the complete sequence of CBS138 and three previously described markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3 were used. We found a genetic diversity of 0.949 by combining four of them. By applying the new microsatellite markers GLM4, GLM5 and GLM6 we were able to discriminate 29 isolates, originally identified by the more established markers, RPM2, MTI and ERG3. When epidemiologically closely related isolates from 36 patients were typed, 25 patients (72%) exhibited identical or highly related multilocus genotypes. We noted a microvariation in 4 of the patients. This minor change of one locus could be explained by a single step mutation. Since one of these patients had not received antifungal treatment; thus, the relationship between genome variation and antifungal therapy remains controversial. We can conclude from our analysis of these new microsatellite markers that they are highly selective and therefore should be considered as a useful typing system for differentiating related and unrelated isolates of C. glabrata, as well as being able to detect microvariation.
Candida albicans and Candida glabrata are the most common causative agents of both vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC). Studying the population structure and genotype differentiation of Candida species that cause RVVC may lead to a significant improvement in clinical management. A total of 106 isolates were collected from 55 patients who were subdivided into three groups. Group I comprised 15 patients with RVVC (n550 isolates); group II comprised 16 patients, who had a history of at least two episodes of VVC in the last year (n532 isolates, two from each patient); and group III comprised 24 patients (n524 isolates) who had experienced a single episode of VVC in the previous 1 year period. C. albicans microsatellite markers CAI, CAIII and CAIV and C. glabrata RPM2, MTI and ERG3 microsatellites were amplified in a multiplex PCR. All isolates were subjected to population genetic analysis, which provided evidence that there is a predominantly clonal population structure of C. albicans in each group. However, recombination was detected to some degree in C. albicans isolates in group III. A genetic homogeneity between the different C. albicans groups was observed. Although, C. glabrata isolates showed an important genetic differentiation between group I and group III (F ST 50.207). Genotype analysis revealed that the dominant genotypes of C. glabrata and C. albicans strains were more prevalent in patients with RVVC. The frequent scenario for cases of recurrent infection in our study was strain replacement (53.3 %). In conclusion, the identification of recurrence-associated genotypes and a specific C. glabrata population structure in the RVVC group could be a significant marker for further investigations of virulence factors and RVVC management.
Yarrowia lipolytica is ubiquitous in the environment, opportunistic, and might be considered as one of the causative agents of catheter-related candidemia. Our work aimed to study some virulence factors of Y. lipolytica such as hydrolases production and biofilm formation with comparison to the most frequent Candida specie in human disease. In sum, 58 clinical isolates of Y. lipolytica, 16 C. glabrata, and 12 C. albicans were collected from Intensive care unit (ICU). All were tested for enzymatic production and biofilm formation. All tested isolates of C. albicans and C. glabrata were able to degrade casein, and 98.2% of Y. lipolytica showed caseinase activity but no gelatinase activity was detected in all isolates. Y. lipolytica strains showed significantly lower (3.4%) in vitro phospholipase activity than C. albicans and C. glabrata (P < .05). No significant differences of the hemolytic activity were detected between the three species (P > .05). Concerning biofilm formation, and unlike the results obtained on polystyrene plate, the number of adhered and biofilm cultivable cells obtained by Y. lipolytica after 168 hours of catheter subcutaneous implantation is significantly greater and tends to be more compact and structured hyphal layer. Although C. albicans remains the most pathogenic yeast, development of selective ability of Y. lipolytica to adhere, to form a biofilm on catheter medical devices, and to produce phospholipase and hemolytic enzyme is of particular interest, and it is strongly recommended to be vigilant in the use of medical implanted medical devices, particularly in ICU.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.