Abstract:Vulvovaginal candidosis (VVC) is a common infection of the female genital tract affecting 75% women at least once in their lifetime. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and potential risk factors associated with VVC and recurrent vulvovaginal candidosis (RVVC). A prospective study of women with vaginitis symptoms was conducted over 2 years in the regional clinic of population and family education in Sfax. A discriminant analysis was used to evaluate the association between the incidence of Can… Show more
“…This genetic diversity of C. glabrata isolates has many consequences for the epidemiology of RVVC. In a previous epidemiological study, we reported that C. glabrata isolates were significantly predominant in cases of RVVC (34 %) versus sporadic VVC (17.5 %) (Amouri et al, 2011). These findings implied that strains with dominant genotypes may be more virulent than others causing sporadic VVC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This suggests that recurrent strains (group I and II) do not possess any significant difference in their genotypes from strains that cause one-off episode of vaginitis (group III). The lack of genetic differentiation of the C. albicans population isolated from RVVC patients is in accordance with the fact that the pathogenesis of RVVC can be due to a myriad of risk factors such as previous history of VVC, intrauterine device contraception and non-compliance with therapy (Amouri et al, 2011;Richter et al, 2005). On the other hand, recurrent C. glabrata isolates were genetically divergent (H50.65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, it was estimated that a second episode follows the first occurrence in approximately 50 % of cases (Sobel, 2007). In a prospective survey of VVC, 69 % of the patients returned with a second symptomatic episode of VVC and the increased number of previous VVC episodes was significantly associated to RVVC (Amouri et al, 2011).…”
Candida albicans and Candida glabrata are the most common causative agents of both vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC). Studying the population structure and genotype differentiation of Candida species that cause RVVC may lead to a significant improvement in clinical management. A total of 106 isolates were collected from 55 patients who were subdivided into three groups. Group I comprised 15 patients with RVVC (n550 isolates); group II comprised 16 patients, who had a history of at least two episodes of VVC in the last year (n532 isolates, two from each patient); and group III comprised 24 patients (n524 isolates) who had experienced a single episode of VVC in the previous 1 year period. C. albicans microsatellite markers CAI, CAIII and CAIV and C. glabrata RPM2, MTI and ERG3 microsatellites were amplified in a multiplex PCR. All isolates were subjected to population genetic analysis, which provided evidence that there is a predominantly clonal population structure of C. albicans in each group. However, recombination was detected to some degree in C. albicans isolates in group III. A genetic homogeneity between the different C. albicans groups was observed. Although, C. glabrata isolates showed an important genetic differentiation between group I and group III (F ST 50.207). Genotype analysis revealed that the dominant genotypes of C. glabrata and C. albicans strains were more prevalent in patients with RVVC. The frequent scenario for cases of recurrent infection in our study was strain replacement (53.3 %). In conclusion, the identification of recurrence-associated genotypes and a specific C. glabrata population structure in the RVVC group could be a significant marker for further investigations of virulence factors and RVVC management.
“…This genetic diversity of C. glabrata isolates has many consequences for the epidemiology of RVVC. In a previous epidemiological study, we reported that C. glabrata isolates were significantly predominant in cases of RVVC (34 %) versus sporadic VVC (17.5 %) (Amouri et al, 2011). These findings implied that strains with dominant genotypes may be more virulent than others causing sporadic VVC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This suggests that recurrent strains (group I and II) do not possess any significant difference in their genotypes from strains that cause one-off episode of vaginitis (group III). The lack of genetic differentiation of the C. albicans population isolated from RVVC patients is in accordance with the fact that the pathogenesis of RVVC can be due to a myriad of risk factors such as previous history of VVC, intrauterine device contraception and non-compliance with therapy (Amouri et al, 2011;Richter et al, 2005). On the other hand, recurrent C. glabrata isolates were genetically divergent (H50.65).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, it was estimated that a second episode follows the first occurrence in approximately 50 % of cases (Sobel, 2007). In a prospective survey of VVC, 69 % of the patients returned with a second symptomatic episode of VVC and the increased number of previous VVC episodes was significantly associated to RVVC (Amouri et al, 2011).…”
Candida albicans and Candida glabrata are the most common causative agents of both vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (RVVC). Studying the population structure and genotype differentiation of Candida species that cause RVVC may lead to a significant improvement in clinical management. A total of 106 isolates were collected from 55 patients who were subdivided into three groups. Group I comprised 15 patients with RVVC (n550 isolates); group II comprised 16 patients, who had a history of at least two episodes of VVC in the last year (n532 isolates, two from each patient); and group III comprised 24 patients (n524 isolates) who had experienced a single episode of VVC in the previous 1 year period. C. albicans microsatellite markers CAI, CAIII and CAIV and C. glabrata RPM2, MTI and ERG3 microsatellites were amplified in a multiplex PCR. All isolates were subjected to population genetic analysis, which provided evidence that there is a predominantly clonal population structure of C. albicans in each group. However, recombination was detected to some degree in C. albicans isolates in group III. A genetic homogeneity between the different C. albicans groups was observed. Although, C. glabrata isolates showed an important genetic differentiation between group I and group III (F ST 50.207). Genotype analysis revealed that the dominant genotypes of C. glabrata and C. albicans strains were more prevalent in patients with RVVC. The frequent scenario for cases of recurrent infection in our study was strain replacement (53.3 %). In conclusion, the identification of recurrence-associated genotypes and a specific C. glabrata population structure in the RVVC group could be a significant marker for further investigations of virulence factors and RVVC management.
“…The population of Candida glabrata clinical isolates included in the present study were recovered during an epidemiological survey of antifungal resistance conducted at the Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax from January 2005 to December 2007 as previously described (Abbes et al, 2011, 2012; Amouri et al, 2011; Sellami et al, 2011). The specimens were isolated from 30 patients with urinary tract infection, vaginal infection or systemic infections.…”
Objectives: This study aimed to elucidate the relative involvement of drug resistance gene copy number and overexpression in fluconazole resistance in clinical C. glabrata isolates using a population-based approach.Methods: Fluconazole resistance levels were quantified using the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) via Etest method. Both gene expression levels and gene copy number of CgCDR1, CgPDH1, CgERG11, and CgSNQ2 were assessed via quantitative real-time PCR. The influence of the main effects and first-level interactions of both the expression level and copy number of these genes on fluconazole resistance levels were analyzed using a multivariate statistical model.Results: Forty-three C. glabrata isolates were collected from 30 patients during in a hospital survey. In the multivariate analysis, C. glabrata fluconazole MICs were independently increased by CgSNQ2 overexpression (p < 10−4) and the interaction between CgPDH1 gene copy number and CgPDH1 expression level (p = 0.038). In contrast, both CgPDH1 overexpression (p = 0.049) and the interaction between CgSNQ2 and CgERG11 expression (p = 0.003) led to a significant decrease in fluconazole MICs.Conclusion: Fluconazole resistance in C. glabrata involves complex interactions between drug resistance gene expression and/or copy number. The population-based multivariate analysis highlighted the involvement of the CgSNQ2 gene in fluconazole resistance and the complex effect of the other genes such as PDH1 for which overexpression was associated with reduced fluconazole resistance levels, while the interaction between PDH1 overexpression and copy number was associated with increased resistance levels.
BackgroundAvailable literature concerning the epidemiologic or clinical features of vulvovaginal candidiasis commonly reports that: 75% of women will experience an episode of vulvovaginal candidiasis in their lifetimes, 50% of whom will experience at least a second episode, and 5-10% of all women will experience recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis (≥4 episodes/1 year). In this debate we traced the three commonly cited statistics to their presumed origins.DiscussionIt is apparent that these figures were inadequately documented and lacked supporting epidemiologic evidence. Population-based studies are needed to make reliable estimates of the lifetime risk of vulvovaginal candidiasis and the proportion of women who experience recurrent candidiasis.SummaryThe extent to which vulvovaginal candidiasis is a source of population-level morbidity remains uncertain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.