The use of prophylactic anti-D to prevent Rh D immunization in Rh D- women and subsequent hemolytic disease in Rh D+ infants is widespread, but has led to shortages of the anti-D Ig. With the aim of substituting monoclonal anti-D for Rh D prophylaxis, we have compared the abilities of monoclonal and polyclonal anti-D to clear Rh D+ red blood cells (RBCs) infused into Rh D- male volunteers and to suppress Rh D immunization. Two human monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), BRAD-3 (IgG3) and BRAD-5 (IgG1), produced from stable Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, were selected because of their proven in vitro activity in promoting RBC lysis in antibody-dependent cell- mediated cytotoxicity assays. RBC clearance was assessed by intravenous injection of 3 mL of 51chromium-labeled D+ RBCs into 27 volunteers 48 hours after intramuscular injection of monoclonal or polyclonal anti-D. Further 3-mL injections of unlabeled D+ cells were administered at 6 and 9 months to induce immunization. Blood samples were taken throughout the 12-month period of study for the serologic detection of anti-D. The mean half-life (t50%) of RBCs in 7 recipients of 300 micrograms BRAD-5 (5.9 hours) was similar to that in 8 recipients of 500 IU polyclonal anti-D (5.0 hours), whereas D+ cells were cleared more slowly in some of the 8 subjects injected with 300 micrograms BRAD- 3 (mean t50% 12.7 hours) and in 1 individual administered 100 micrograms BRAD-3 (t50% 41.0 hours). The rate of RBC clearance in both groups administered 300 micrograms monoclonal anti-D correlated with the amount of antibody bound per cell, determined by flow cytometry. There was no evidence of primary immunization having occurred in any subject after 6 months of follow-up. Five of 24 subjects produced anti- D after one or two further injections of RBCs, confirming that they were responders who had been protected by the monoclonal or polyclonal anti-D administered initially. Four of these responders were recipients of monoclonal anti-D (3 BRAD-3, 1 BRAD-5). One individual who received BRAD-5 produced accelerated clearance of D+ RBCs at the third unprotected RBC challenge but did not seroconvert. This study shows that the human MoAbs BRAD-3 and BRAD-5 can prevent Rh D immunization, and indicates that they may be suitable replacements for the polyclonal anti-D presently used in prophylaxis of Rh D hemolytic disease of the newborn.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Serum samples containing IgG red blood cell (RBC) antibodies were collected without reference to clinical information from 131 pregnant alloimmunized women. Anti-D and anti-K were present in sera from 75 and 20 patients respectively. Antibody titres were determined by indirect antiglobulin test (IAGT), anti-D levels were measured by AutoAnalyzer, RBC-binding IgG was quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (SOL-ELISA), and functional activities were measured using the monocyte chemiluminescence (CL) test, antibody-dependent monocyte-mediated and K cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays, and rosette formation with U937 cells. Details of clinical outcomes were obtained retrospectively from 104 pregnancies. Forty-one babies were 'antigen-negative', and of the remainder, four required top-up transfusions, 12 required exchange transfusions, three received intrauterine transfusions, and two died in utero. A comparison of test results with severity of haemolytic disease of the newborn (HDN) showed that, provided sera tested were collected within 8 weeks of the expected delivery date, the CL test and the monocyte-mediated ADCC assay differentiated those D-positive babies which required exchange transfusions from those unaffected or only mildly affected. The usefulness of results from the AutoAnalyzer and IAGT in predicting disease severity was compromised by the wide range of results from mothers of unaffected babies. This variability was less apparent in the SOL-ELISA which predicted severe HDN with greater precision. Results from the U937 rosette assay and the K cell-mediated ADCC assay failed to correlate with disease severity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.