We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of 53 patients admitted for 73 episodes of myasthenic crisis at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center over a period of 12 years, from 1983 to 1994. Median age at the onset of first crisis was 55 (range, 20 to 82), the ratio of women to men was 2:1, and the median interval from onset of symptoms to first crisis was 8 months. Infection (usually pneumonia or upper respiratory infection) was the most common precipitating factor (38%), followed by no obvious cause (30%) and aspiration (10%). Twenty-five percent of patients were extubated at 7 days, 50% at 13 days, and 75% at 31 days; the longest crisis exceeded 5 months. Using survival analysis and backward stepwise Cox regression, we identified three independent predictors of prolonged intubation: (1) pre-intubation serum bicarbonate > or = 30 mg/dl (p = 0.0004, relative hazard 4.5), (2) peak vital capacity day 1 to 6 post-intubation < 25 ml/kg (p = 0.001, relative hazard 2.9), and (3) age > 50 (p = 0.01, relative hazard 2.4). The proportion of patients intubated longer than 2 weeks was 0% among those with no risk factors, 21% with one risk factor, 46% with two risk factors, and 88% with three risk factors (p = 0.0004). Complications independently associated with prolonged intubation included atelectasis (p = 0.002), anemia treated with transfusion (p = 0.03), Clostridium difficile infection (p = 0.01), and congestive heart failure (p = 0.03). Three episodes of crisis were fatal, for a mortality rate of 4% (3/73); four additional patients died after extubation. All seven deaths were due to overwhelming medical comorbidity. Over half of those who survived were functionally dependent (home or institutionalized) at discharge. In addition to prospective controlled studies of immunotherapies, the prevention and treatment of medical complications offers the best opportunity for further improving the outcome of myasthenic crisis.

We investigated the association among metabolically healthy obesity (MHO), cardiovascular disease (CVD)risk, and all-cause mortality in the Asian population. We searched databases from inception to 16 November, 2019 and pooled data using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to the following comparison groups: MHNW (without overweight or underweight participants) and MHNO (non-obese, including overweight and underweight participants). Nineteen studies were included. The mean Newcastle–Ottawa Scale score was 7.8. Participants with MHO had a significantly higher CVD risk (odds ratio (OR) = 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.13–1.63) and significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78–1.00) than the comparison group. Subgroup analyses revealed participants with MHO had a significantly higher CVD risk than MHNW participants (OR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.24–2.08; I2 = 73%), but there was no significant difference compared with MHNO participants (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.80–1.36; I2 = 68%). Participants with MHO had a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (OR = 0.83; 95% CI = 0.78–0.88; I2 = 9%) than MHNO participants, but a borderline significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than MHNW participants (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 0.99–1.72; I2 = 0%). The CVD risk and all-cause mortality of the MHO group changed depending on the control group. Thus, future studies should select control groups carefully.

Background: Little evidence is available about the risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) in patients with thyroid diseases. We assessed whether a diagnosis of thyroid disease, particularly hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, is associated with SSNHL risk in an Asian population. Material and Methods: This case-control study was conducted with population-based data from Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Research Database from January 2000 to December 2013. The case group comprised 3331 adult patients with newly diagnosed SSNHL, and four controls without SSNHL for each case matched by sex, age, monthly income, and urbanization level of residence. Underlying Thyroid diseases were retrospectively evaluated in the case and control groups. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to explore relations between thyroid diseases and SSNHL. Results: Of the 3331 cases, 5.7% had preexisting thyroid diseases, whereas only 4.0% of the 13,324 controls had the same condition. After adjustment for sex, age, monthly income, urbanization level of residence, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic otitis media, and hyperlipidemia, associations were identified between a history of either hypothyroidism (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.54; 95% CI, 1.02–2.32; p = 0.042) or hyperthyroidism (AOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07–1.85; p = 0.015) and an elevated risk of SSNHL. In subgroup analysis, the correlation between hypothyroidism and increased SSNHL risk remained significant only for patients aged over 50 years (AOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.01–2.57; p = 0.045), and that between hyperthyroidism and SSNHL was significant only for female patients (AOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09–2.01; p = 0.012). Treatment for hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism did not alter the association in subgroup analyses. Conclusion: Preexisting hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism appear associated with SSNHL susceptibility in Taiwan. Physicians should be wary of this elevated risk of SSNHL among patients with previously diagnosed thyroid dysfunction, especially women and patients aged more than 50 years.

BackgroundSudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) is a relatively common condition that is usually of unknown etiology. A number of individual studies have investigated the association between various serum lipids and SSNHL; however, the findings have been inconsistent. In an attempt to obtain more definitive information on the relationship between serum lipids and SSNHL, we carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsMedline, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched using the following key words: lipid, cholesterol, triglyceride, fat, serum, blood, sudden hearing loss, hearing loss, hearing disorders. Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective case-control studies involving patients with SSNHL and healthy controls that examined the relationship (reported as odds ratios [OR]) between lipid profiles and SSNHL were included. Primary outcomes were total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations. Secondary outcomes were triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) concentrations.ResultsA total of 6 case-control studies were included in this systematic review/meta-analysis. The total number of participants ranged from 30 to 250 in the case group and from 43 to 271 in the control group. Meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in total cholesterol levels between the case and control groups (pooled OR = 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.98 to 3.26, P = 0.057). Likewise, meta-analysis revealed no significant difference in LDL-C concentrations between the case and control groups (pooled OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.07, P = 0.639). Since there were an insufficient number of studies reporting data for the secondary outcomes, meta-analysis was not possible.ConclusionsOur results do not provide evidence for serum lipids being associated with SSNHL, nor do they definitively rule out such an association. Additional studies are needed to ascertain the relationship, or lack thereof, between serum lipids and SSNHL.

Background. The effects of smoking on human metabolism are complex. Although smoking increases risk for diabetes mellitus, smoking cessation was also reported to be associated with weight gain and incident diabetes mellitus. We therefore conducted this study to clarify the association between smoking status and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. Methods. An analysis was done using the data of a mass health examination performed annually in an industrial park from 2007 to 2013. The association between smoking status and newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus was analyzed with adjustment for weight gain and other potential confounders. Results. Compared with never-smokers, not only current smokers but also ex-smokers in their first two years of abstinence had higher odds ratios (ORs) for newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (never-smokers 3.6%, OR as 1; current smokers 5.5%, OR = 1.499, 95% CI = 1.147–1.960, and p = 0.003; ex-smokers in their first year of abstinence 7.5%, OR = 1.829, 95% CI = 0.906–3.694, and p = 0.092; and ex-smokers in their second year of abstinence 9.0%, OR = 2.020, 95% CI = 1.031–3.955, and p = 0.040). Conclusion. Smoking cessation generally decreased risk for newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus. However, increased odds were seen within the first 2 years of abstinence independently of weight gain.