BackgroundRenal replacement therapy (RRT) is growing by 10 % per year in Russia, but pre-dialysis care which can retard CKD progression and delay the start of RRT remains limited. We evaluate the effect of Essential Amino Acids and Keto-analogues (EAA/KA) on CKD progression.MethodsThe effect of low protein diet (LPD), supplemented by EAA/KA, on GFR slope changes between first and second treatment period (five sequential visits per period) in 96 patients withs CKD Stage 3B-5 was compared to GFR slope changes in the control group of 96 patients, randomly selected from matched (by gender, age, diagnosis and CKD Stage) cohort of 320 patients from the city Registry. The mean baseline eGFR was 23 ± 9 ml/min/1.73 m2; 29 % had CKD3B, 45 % - CKD4, 26 % - CKD5.ResultsThe rate of eGFR decline changed from −2.71 ± 2.38 to −2.01 ± 2.26 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year in the treatment group and from −2.18 ± 2.01 to −2.04 ± 2.18 ml/min/1.73 m2 per year in the control group. Only in the treatment group the difference was significant (p = 0.04 and p = 0.6). Standardized effect size for intervention was significant in treatment group: −0.3 (of pooled SD), 95 % CI −0.58 ÷ −0.02 and non-significant in control group: −0.07 (−0.35 ÷ +0.22). The univariate and multivariate analysis of EAA/KA therapy effect demonstrated that it was probably more effective in patients of older age, with higher time-averaged proteinuria (PU), lower phosphate level, in patients with glomerular v. interstitial diseases, and in females. Only the latter factor was significant at pre-specified level (<0.05).ConclusionsLPD combined with EAA/KA supplementation lead to the decrease of the CKD progression both in well-designed clinical study and in real nephrology practice in wide variety diseases and settings. Registry data can be helpful to reveal patients with optimal chances for beneficial effect of LPD supplemented by EAA/KA.Trial registrationISRCTN28190556 06/05/2016.
The course of the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a critical increase in the burden on virtually all major branches of the health care system in our country and abroad. The aim of this article is to analyse the activities of the different parts of the city nephrology service in Saint-Petersburg and to consider promising ways to improve it. The nephrology service for the adult population in St. Petersburg includes: outpatient service; inpatient service - 183 beds in 24-hour inpatient departments of the city; dialysis service - 10 dialysis units in municipal medical organizations, 5 in federal institutions, and 8 centers/departments operating in the framework of private-public partnership. The number of patients on dialysis programme decreased by 10.5 % to 1,839 in 2021. These changes are likely due to an increase in mortality among these patients in 2020 and 2021 which is a consequence not only of COVID-19 but also of the adverse impact of the pandemic on the health system. The proportion of patients treated as outpatients in private dialysis centres increased during the three-year period. The incidence of arteriovenous fistula formation in primary vascular access decreased from 33.2 % to 14.2 % in 2020 compared with 2019. At the same time, the use of temporary central venous catheters as primary vascular access for renal replacement therapy has increased significantly from 43.0 % to 61.9 %. The development of the nephrology service is largely determined by its funding. To compensate the costs of medical in stitutions in the city for conducting renal replacement therapy it is necessary to increase the tariffs of compulsory health insurance (CHI) by at least 50 %. In the medical organizations of Saint-Petersburg municipal and federal subordination the share of "artificial kidney" devices that have used up their resource is 32.2 %, and in a number of medical institutions it exceeds 50 %.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.