Pasca amandemen UUD Negara Republik Indonesia 1945 Pasal 33 ayat (3) yang berbunyi “Bumi, air dan kekayaan yang terkandung di dalamnya dikuasai oleh negara dan dipergunakan sebesar-besarnya bagi kemakmuran rakyat” penguasaan negara yang ada dalam Pasal 33 ayat (3) tersebut hanya mengatur pada bumi, air dan yang terkandung di dalamnya. Padahal saat ini keberadaan ruang angkasa berhubungan erat dengan hajat hidup orang banyak, salah satunya pemanfaatan GSO (geo stationary orbit) yang merupakan sumber daya alam terbatas. Sehingga hal tersebut menimbulkan masalah baru khususnya bagi Indonesia sebagai negara khatulistiwa yang mana penempatan GSO berada di atasnya. Masalah tersebut adalah bagaimana internalisasi terkait konsep penguasaan negara menurut Pasal 33 ayat (3) UUD NRI 1945 terhadap pemanfaatan sumber daya alam yang ada dalam wilayah ruang angkasa, serta bagaimana regulasi-regulasi yang mengatur terkait pemanfaatan sumber daya alam di wilayah ruang angkasa apakah sudah sesuai dipergunakan sebesar-besarnya bagi kemakmuran rakyat. Dalam penelitian ini digunakan metode penelitian analisis kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini memberikan gambaran bahwa keberadaan ruang angkasa memiliki peranan penting bagi setiap negara, khususnya keberadaan GSO sebagai sumber daya alam terbatas, keberadan GSO hanya ada di atas khatulistiwa dan Indonesia salah satu negara yang dilalui garis khatulistiwa. Beragam konvensi internasional yang telah disahkan ke dalam peraturan di Indonesia maupun regulasi yang ada di Indonesia berkenaan dengan pemanfaatan ruang angkasa sampai saat ini belum memberikan manfaat dan pengaturan yang komprehensif terkait memanfaatkan sumber daya alam yang terkandung dalam wilayah ruang angkasa tersebut, sehingga menjadi suatu keharusan bagi Indonesia sebagai negara yang berdaulat untuk memberikan jaminan secara konstitusional bagi keberadaan sumber daya alam yang ada dalam wilayah ruang angkasa untuk dipergunakan sebesar-besarnya bagi kemakmuran rakyat.After the amendment to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 33 paragraph (3) that stated "The land, the water and the natural resources within shall be under the powers of the State and shall be used to the greatest benefit of the people" the state authorities in Article 33 paragraph (3) only regulates earth, water and and the natural resources within. Whereas today, the existence of the outer space is closely associated with the lives of many people, as such, the utilization of GSO (Geostationary Orbit) which is a limited natural resource. So that it rises new issues, especially for Indonesia as an equatorial country where the placement of GSOs is above it. The problem is how to internalization the utilization of natural resources in outer space (related to the concept of state authorities according to Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia), and how the regulation that regulates the utilitazion of natural resources in outer space are appropriately used to the greatest benefit of the people. This study aims to answer these two issuess by investigating normatively or library research. This law research conducted by analyzing secondary data from primary, secondary and tertiary materials. In this qualitative analysis research, the secondary data from primary, secondary and tertiary materials connected to each other and interpreted in order to find answers to solve the research issues. The results of this study provide an overview about the existence of outer space which has an important role for every country, especially the existence of the GSO as a limited natural resource. GSO only exists above the equator and Indonesia is one of the countries which is passed by the equator. International conventions that have been ratified into Indonesian regulations and regulations in Indonesia relating to the utilization of outer space have not provided a comprehensive benefits and regulations related to utilizing natural resources contained in these outer space areas, so that it becomes a necessity for Indonesia as a sovereign country to provide constitutional guarantees for the existence of natural resources that exist in the outer space to be used as much as possible for the prosperity of the people.

Regulation concerning limiting on campaign funds have not proven to limit campaign funds from donors with binding interests. Therefore, the needs to identify various weaknesses in the regulation concerning a limitation on campaign funds to optimize clean campaign by preventing conflicts of interest, ensure transparency and ensure independence in making post election policies. Normative legal research methods used in this study starts from primary legal materials including all laws and regulations concerning campaign funds in regional head election and literature review which related to regional head election, secondary materials and tertiary material. This research concludes that it is necessary to affirm the limitation of campaign funds, regulating composition of contributors with the reasonableness ratio, reformulation of sanctions which excess the limit of campaign funds, and application of investigative audit.IntisariSaat ini regulasi pembatasan dana kampanye terkait pemasukan terbukti belum mampu membatasinya dari penyumbang dengan kepentingan yang mengikat. Oleh karena itu,  identifikasi kelemahan dari regulasi pembatasan dana kampanye untuk mengoptimalisasi pembatasan dana kampanye diperlukan untuk mencegah konflik kepentingan, menjamin transparansi asal sumbangan dan menjamin kemandirian dalam mengambil kebijakan tanpa terikat dengan donatur kampanye. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif digunakan dengan meneliti bahan pustaka. Bahan hukum primer yaitu, peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur mengenai dana kampanye dalam pemilu, khususnya pemilu kepala daerah, Bahan hukum sekunder dan Bahan hukum tersier. Penelitian ini menghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa perlu penegasan pembatasan dana kampanye yang bersumber dari perorangan, penegasan komposisi penyumbang dengan rasio kewajaran, reformulasi sanksi kelebihan dana kampanye, dan penerapan audit investigasi.

Since the reformation era, the number of laws and regulations has continued to increase. In the period 2000-2017 there have been 35,901 regulations. The highest number is Regional Regulation (Perda), which has reached 14,225 Perda. Followed by Ministerial Regulation (Permen) as many as 11,873 regulations. While on the third place, sit 3,163 non-ministerial regulations. This research has the main objective of finding the best alternative policy to simplify and rearrange the regulations as an agenda for the law reform. This is a normative juridical research. The data used are secondary data that includes primary and secondary legal material in the form of relevant laws and regulations used as samples as examples of regulations that are out of sync, incoherent, and potentially overlapping. The results concluded that the arrangement of the regulations can be carried out on three sectors, which are the simplification of regulations, reconceptualization in order to understand the regulatory requirements, and creating synergies amongst the the law-makers.

Indonesian constitutional reform after the fall of Soeharto’s New Order brings favorable direction for the judiciary. Constitutional guarantee of judicial independence as regulated in Art 24 (1) of the 1945 Constitution, has closed dark memories in the past. This article decides that the Judiciary is held by the Supreme Court and the judicial bodies below and a Constitutional Court. Such a strict direction of regulation plus the transformation of the political system in a democratic direction should bring about the implementation of the independent and autonomous judiciary. But in reality, even though in a democratic political system and constitutional arrangement affirms the guarantee of independence, but it doesn’t represent the actual situation. There are some problems that remain, such as (i) the absence of a permanent format regarding the institutional relationship between the Supreme Court, the Constitutional Court, and the Judicial Commission, and (ii) still many efforts to weaken judiciary through different ways such criminalization of judge. Referring to the problem above, then there are gaps between what "is" and what "ought", among others. First, by changing political configuration that tends to be more democratic, the judiciary should be more autonomous. In this context, various problems arise such as (i) disharmony in regulating the pattern of relations between judicial power actors, (ii) various attempts to criminalize judges over their decisions, and (iii) judicial corruption. Second, by the constitutional guarantee of the independence of the judiciary, there will be no legislation that that may reduce constitutional guarantee. However, there are many legislation or regulations that still not in line with a constitutional guarantee concerning judicial independence. This paper reviews and describes in-depth about how to implement constitutional guarantees of judicial independence after the political transition and conceptualize its order to strengthen rule of law in Indonesia

Each legal system has its own theory of statutory formation, both countries that apply civil law and common law legal systems. The tendency to form laws in Indonesia after the realization of the need for regulatory reform has resulted in a growing awareness of making breakthroughs by using the omnibus method which is generally applicable in countries that apply the common law system. The question is whether this method is suitable to be adopted into the legal system of Indonesia? This article intends to examine the compatibility of the omnibus method and the solutions that need to be used to overcome its compatibility problems. This research concludes that if Indonesia is to adopt the omnibus method, it also requires a consolidation method before and after the enactment of legislation with the omnibus method, this is intended to consolidate it with the affected legislation.