Introduction:
The Wertheim's radical abdominal hysterectomy (RAH) has been the traditional surgical approach for operable Stage IB cervical cancer in Singapore whereas total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (TLRH) was introduced only in 2009. In this study, we aimed to compare the long-term surgical outcome between the two routes of surgery in our center.
Methods:
This is a prospective study performed in a single large tertiary institution in Singapore. Inclusion criteria included surgically fit patients with early cervical cancer and no radiological evidence of regional or distant metastases.
Results:
From November 2009 to December 2014, 51 TLRHs and 85 RAHs were performed. Median blood loss in the TLRH group was significantly lower than in the RAH group (300 vs. 500 mL;
P
= 0.002) as was median hospital stay (5 vs. 6 days;
P
= 0.001). Operative time was significantly higher in the TLRH group (262 vs. 228 min;
P
< 0.001). There was no significant difference in bladder recovery. Intraoperative complications were encountered in 2 (3.9%) TLRH patients and 1 (1.2%) RAH patient. Postoperative complications occurred in 3 (5.9%) TLRH patients and 8 (9.4%) RAH patients. With a median follow-up of 117 (range 1.6–314.6) weeks in the TLRH group and 143.3 (range 0.4–304.7) weeks in the RAH group, 9 (17.6%) TLRH patients and 7 (8.2%) RAH patients had recurrence. There was no significant difference in the overall 3-year survival between the TLRH group and the RAH group for tumor size ≤2 cm (100.0% vs. 97.0%;
P
= 0.37). However, there was a trend toward lower survival for the TLRH group for tumor size >2 cm (61.9% vs. 85.4%;
P
= 0.06).
Conclusion:
The results of our study suggest that with appropriate patient selection, TLRH can be a safe and effective procedure for the management of early cervical cancer in Singapore, especially in women with small tumors ≤2 cm but should be used with caution in women with larger tumors.
Spontaneous haemoperitoneum in pregnancy (SHiP) is a rare but serious condition associated with an adverse pregnancy outcome. We present a case of previable twin pregnancy presenting with SHiP secondary to endometriosis, necessitating an emergency laparotomy and hysterotomy as a life-saving measure to achieve haemostasis. At laparotomy there was massive haemoperitoneum with active bleeding from the left fallopian tube and a left salpingectomy was performed. Histological examination showed haemorrhagic foci of endometriosis on the fallopian tube exhibiting florid stromal decidual change. We wish to raise awareness of this uncommon but potentially life-threatening condition requiring early recognition and prompt recourse to surgical intervention to minimise the morbidity and mortality.
The aim of this study was to determine whether the position of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) has an effect on the resolution of irritative symptoms in women undergoing the TVT operation. Initial audit suggested that more distally placed tapes were more likely to result in the resolution of irritative symptoms. An appropriately powered study was designed to test this theory. Seventy-seven women with urodynamic evidence of detrusor overactivity and urodynamic stress incontinence underwent a transperineal ultrasound scan to ascertain the position of the tape after a TVT. The tape was categorised as proximal, middle or distal urethra. The resolution of irritative symptoms was assessed compared to the TVT position. Forty-five women had distal tapes, 30 had mid-urethral tapes and two had proximal tapes. Women with the TVT placed on the distal urethra were no more likely to experience resolution of their irritative symptoms than women with tapes on the mid-urethra (p > 0.05). Placement of the TVT on any one part of the urethra is not more likely to result in resolution of irritative bladder symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.