BackgroundImmune dysfunction in breast cancer patients is well established. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) is an immunosuppressive enzyme that is linked with progression of cancer. IDO is overexpressed in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cases.Materials and methodsWe conducted the first study to analyze IDO expression and overall survival in breast cancer cases in Pakistan. Expression of IDO, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human EGF receptor 2 (HER2) was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues of 100 (TNBC, n=49 and non-TNBC, n=51) patients were obtained from Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre. IDO expression was analyzed in association with clinicopathological features and overall survival. A total of 100 patients were classified based on the ordinal IDO score variables as low, medium, and high. In addition, overall mean age and SD of patients was 48.28±11.82.ResultsImmunohistochemical analysis showed that high IDO was observed in the TNBC patients (65.3%) compared to that in the non-TNBC patients (33.3%). Multivariable analyses showed that TNBC was an independent risk factor for high IDO expression. Overall survival was also significantly associated with IDO score.ConclusionOur study showed that IDO protein expression is higher in TNBC patients (P<0.01) and may suggest its role in disease pathogenesis. TNBC might be effectively treated with IDO inhibitors. Furthermore, high IDO expression is considerably associated with overall decreased patient survival. IDO might be utilized as a potential biomarker and immunotherapeutic target in breast cancer patients.

No abstract

BackgroundCancer patients are considered as highly vulnerable individuals in the current COVID-19 pandemic. We studied the clinical characteristics of survivor and non-survivor COVID-19-infected cancer patients in Pakistan.Patients and MethodsWe did a retrospective study of 70 cancer patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection from Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore and Peshawar, Pakistan between April 13 and July 09, 2020. These patients were discharged from the hospital or had died by July 09, 2020. Clinical, pathological and radiological characteristics were compared between survivors and non-survivors by fisher’s exact test and chi-square test. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to explore the risk factors of mortality.ResultsSeventy cancer patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled and the majority were males 38 (54.3%). 57 (81.4%) had solid tumors and 13 (18.6%) had hematological malignancies. Dyspnea (44 cases) was the most common symptom (62.9%). Complications were reported in 51 (72.9%) patients during the course of disease. 19 (27.1%) patients were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). A significant increase in the C-reactive protein level and neutrophil count was observed in the deceased patients as compared to the surviving patients. D-dimer values of ≥0.2 mg/L were significantly associated with mortality (P=0.01). We identified two independent risk factors associated with death, ICU admission (P=0.007) and D-dimer (P=0.003).ConclusionPakistani cancer patients with COVID-19 infection reported poor prognosis. Intensive surveillance of clinicopathological characteristics of cancer patients infected with COVID-19 especially D-dimer values may play a pivotal role in the outcome of the disease.

Background and objective Müllerian adenosarcomas (MA) are rare biphasic tumors with benign epithelial and sarcomatous stromal components. There is very limited cohort study data on MA in the South Asian countries and no such study has been attempted in Pakistan. Our aim was to evaluate the clinicopathological characteristics of MA and to review the published literature on the condition. Additionally, we also analyzed the impact of various prognostic factors on the overall survival (OS) of patients with MA. Materials and methods This was a retrospective observational study performed at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore from 2003 to 2020. A total of 59 histologically confirmed cases of MA were included in the study and critically reviewed. Results The mean age of the patients was 54 ±16 years, and the most common tumor location was the uterine corpus (48, 81.4%), followed by the cervix (eight, 13.6%), ovary (two, 3.4%), and vagina (one, 1.7%). Sarcomatous overgrowth (SO) was seen in 22 (37.3%) patients, and high-grade cytology was observed in 18 (30.5%) patients. Furthermore, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was present in six (10.2%) patients, and myometrial invasion was noted in 25 (42.4%) patients. The follow-up details of 29 patients were available, and death was recorded in 13 (44.8%) patients with a median OS of three years. Conclusion MA is a rare and diagnostically challenging entity due to its wide differential diagnosis. It is essential to take note of different morphological features such as SO, cytological features, LVI, and heterologous differentiation because of their significant prognostic impact.

Introduction: Melanoma ranks 19th among malignancies overall and second among cutaneous types. The incidence worldwide has been on the rise over the last seven decades. Various prognostic factors have been assessed and found to have a profound impact on patient outcome. However, no such studies have been attempted in our population. Our study aimed to have an insight into the behavior of malignant melanoma in our population. Materials and Methods: Cases of cutaneous malignant melanoma treated and followed up at our institute were included in this study. Cases of mucosal and choroidal melanoma were excluded. The parameters noted were age, gender, tumor thickness, Clark level, and presence of ulceration. These parameters were individually correlated with development of distant metastasis, two-year survival, survival duration, and primary tumor and lymph node stage. Appropriate statistical analyses were done. Results: Thirty patients of cutaneous malignant melanomas were treated and followed up at our institution. There was male predilection of 1:1.5. Mean age at diagnosis was 50.1 years. Twoyear survival was significantly better in females. Sun-exposed areas of the skin were most commonly involved followed by anal canal that has an unusually high incidence in our society. Majority of our cases were pT4(25) on tumor, nodal status, metastasis (TNM) staging at time of diagnosis. Increasing tumor thickness in terms of primary tumor staging was not found to have any significant impact on two-year survival, distant metastasis, lymph node stage, or survival duration. Sixty percent of cases had ulceration. There was no statistically significant effect on two-year survival (78% in ulcerated group vs 75% in nonulcerated group) and distant metastasis (61% vs 58.3%). In terms of Clark level, 20 cases were level V, seven cases were level IV, two were level III, and one was level I. There was no statistically significant difference between the Clark levels in terms of two years survival, development of distant metastasis, and lymph node stages. Conclusion: Melanoma is an aggressive malignancy that causes high morbidity and morality. It commonly presents at an advanced stage at time of diagnosis in our population. Broader studies are required with early-stage melanomas to compare the various prognostic factors and their impact on prognosis.