Background and Objectives: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects over 250 million people globally, carrying a notable economic burden. This systematic literature review aimed to highlight the economic burden associated with moderate-to-very severe COPD and to investigate key drivers of healthcare resource utilization (HRU), direct costs and indirect costs for this patient population. Materials and Methods: Relevant publications published between January 1, 2006 and November 14, 2016 were captured from the Embase, MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process databases. Supplemental searches from relevant 2015-2016 conferences were also performed. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by two independent researchers against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Studies were grouped by the type of economic outcome presented (HRU or costs). Where possible, data were also grouped according to COPD severity and/or patient exacerbation history. Results: In total, 73 primary publications were included in this review: 66 reported HRU, 22 reported direct costs and one reported indirect costs. Most of the studies (94%) reported on data from either Europe or North America. Trends were noted across multiple studies for higher direct costs (including mean costs per patient per year and mean costs per exacerbation) being associated with increasingly severe COPD and/or a history of more frequent or severe exacerbations. Similar trends were noted according to COPD severity and/or exacerbation history for rate of hospitalization and primary care visits. Multivariate analyses were reported by 29 studies and demonstrated the statistical significance of these associations. Several other drivers of increased costs and HRU were highlighted for patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD, including comorbidities, and treatment history. Conclusion: Moderate-to-very severe COPD represents a considerable economic burden for healthcare providers despite the availability of efficacious treatments and comprehensive guidelines on their use. Further research is warranted to ensure cost-efficient COPD management, to improve treatments and ease budgetary pressures.

BackgroundInfection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is necessary for the development of cervical carcinoma. By contrast, the role of HPV in the pathogenesis of other malignancies, such as head and neck cancers, is less well characterised. This study aimed to address key information gaps by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of HPV infection in head and neck cancers, focusing on data for European populations.MethodsMEDLINE, Embase and grey literature sources were systematically searched for primary studies that were published in English between July 2002 and July 2012, and which reported on the prevalence of HPV infection in head and neck cancers in European populations. Studies on non-European populations, those not published in English, and those assessing patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus were excluded. Eligible studies were combined in a meta-analysis. In addition, the potential statistical association between the head and neck cancers and certain HPV types was investigated.ResultsThirty-nine publications met the inclusion criteria. The prevalence of HPV of any type in 3,649 patients with head and neck cancers was 40.0% (95% confidence interval, 34.6% to 45.5%), and was highest in tonsillar cancer (66.4%) and lowest in pharyngeal (15.3%) and tongue (25.7%) cancers. There were no statistically significant associations between the HPV types analysed and the geographical setting, type of sample analysed or type of primer used to analyse samples in head and neck cancers.ConclusionsThe prevalence of HPV infection in European patients with head and neck cancers is high but varies between the different anatomical sites of these malignancies. There appears to be no association between HPV type and geographical setting, type of samples analysed or type of primer used to analyse samples in such cancers.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-968) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

Background Deep neuromuscular blockade may facilitate the use of reduced insufflation pressure without compromising the surgical field of vision. The current evidence, which suggests improved surgical conditions compared with other levels of block during laparoscopic surgery, features significant heterogeneity. We examined surgical patient-and healthcare resource use-related outcomes of deep neuromuscular blockade compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review according to the quality standards recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Randomized controlled trials comparing outcomes of deep neuromuscular blockade and moderate neuromuscular blockade among adults undergoing laparoscopic surgeries were included. A random-effects model was used to conduct pair-wise meta-analyses. Results The systematic literature review included 15 studies-only 13 were analyzable in the metaanalysis and none were judged to be at high risk of bias. Compared with moderate neuromuscular blockade, deep neuromuscular blockade was associated with improved surgical field of vision and higher vision quality scores. Also, deep neuromuscular blockade was associated with a reduction in the post-operative pain scores in the post-anesthesia care

BackgroundLower influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) against circulating H3N2 strains compared with other influenza viruses is partly explained by antigenic mismatch between circulating strains and the vaccine strain (Belongia 2016). This mismatch has recently been linked to a new glycosylation site introduced in the egg-adaptation step (Zost 2017) and HA L194P substitution (Wu 2017) for H3N2. Vaccine manufactured using seed virus wholly grown in mammalian (e.g., Madin–Darby Canine Kidney—MDCK) cells, as with the NH17-18 version of Flucelvax®, avoids these mutations. Preliminary reports suggest that this cell-based vaccine showed greater VE than did similar egg-based vaccines [FDA Statement]. This study aimed to compile existing data on antigenic similarity to measure the degree of match with circulating wild-type isolates of egg- and MDCK-propagated versions of the vaccine H3N2 virus over multiple seasons.MethodsUsing publicly available reports from the Worldwide Influenza Centre, London (Crick), we compiled data on antigenic similarity, defined as H3N2 circulating wild-type virus isolates showing no more than a 4-fold reduction in titer to antisera raised against wholly MDCK- or egg-propagated versions of the vaccine H3N2 viruses. Titers were compared using hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays and/or plaque reduction neutralization assays (PRNA).ResultsData from Northern Hemisphere influenza seasons of 2011–2012 to 2017–2018 show a substantially higher proportion of tested circulating influenza H3N2 viruses matched the MDCK-propagated reference viruses than did corresponding egg-propagated reference vaccine viruses (Figures 1 and 2). In half of the seasons evaluated, there was little to no antigenic similarity between circulating viruses and the egg-based vaccine viral seed.ConclusionThese data suggest higher levels of mismatch have occurred consistently with egg-propagated H3N2 reference viruses compared with MDCK-propagated reference viruses when measured against circulating wild-type isolates and may further explain the potential for lower VE observed against H3N2 historically. Furthermore, these data point to the importance of continuing to utilize cell-derived seeds in creating seasonal influenza vaccines for this strain. Disclosures S. Rajaram, Seqirus: Employee, Salary. J. Van Boxmeer, Seqirus: Employee, Salary. B. Leav, Seqirus: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. P. Suphaphiphat, Seqirus: Employee, Salary. I. Iheanacho, Seqirus: Consultant, Research support. K. Kistler, Seqirus: Consultant, Research support.