<p><em>Penyebab konflik berkepanjangan antara Israel dan Palestina telah menjadi perdebatan sejak konflik ini bermula di awal abad 20. Berbagai penelitian telah menjelaskan faktor-faktor penyebab konflik melalu berbagai instrument dan teori. Tulisan ini ingin menganalisis penyebab konflik dari sisi budaya politik masing-masing bangsa dengan menggunakan teori Budaya Politik dari Gabriel Almond dan Sydney Verba. Analisis akan dilihat dari tiga komponen. Pertama, sistem budaya, proses budaya, dan kebijakan budaya Israel dan Palestina. Kedua, orientasi perilaku masing-masing bangsa terhadap sistem politik. Ketiga, respon dan perilaku Israel dan Palestina terhadap kebijakan luar negeri dan dalam negeri di dalam sistem politik. Tulisan ini menilai bahwa penyebab konflik terjadi akibat adanya benturan kepentingan dan kepercayaan dari kedua pihak yang melekat pada budaya politik masing-masing. Israel meyakini bahwa tanah yang mulanya ditempati bangsa Palestina merupakan hak mereka yang diamanahkan kepercayaan mereka. Tidak hanya itu, misi pergerakan Zionisme juga menjadi salah satu sumber konflik berkepanjangan ini. Kemudian, nilai-nilai ini berbenturan dengan budaya politik bangsa Palestina sebagai bagian dari bangsa Arab. Tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa penggunaan teori budaya politik cukup untuk menjelaskan akar permasalahan Israel-Palestina selama ini dalam ranah identitas dan perilaku kedua bangsa berdasarkan kepentingan politiknya masing-masing. Namun, penggunaan teori ini kurang dapat menjabarkan dengan detail sejauh mana budaya politik bangsa Palestina menjadi akar dari konflik abadi ini. </em></p><p><em>Kata Kunci: Israel-Palestine, Konflik, Budaya Politik, Orientasi Politik, Nilai </em></p>

<p class="p1">This study examines the Indonesian government's commitment to gender equality as part of SGD 5. Gender equality is a human security concern that is fundamental to Indonesia's development. Thus, Indonesia's commitment and seriousness must be assessed to ensure that the agreed-upon SDG targets are met. The writers employ the concepts of SDGs and Human Security as analytical tools in evaluating and analyzing Indonesia's promises. The writers classify the aims specified in SDG 5 using the UNDP's seven elements of human security. The writers next explain the strategies and capacities required to handle human security based on the elements. The writers also employ a qualitative content analysis method in which the researchers evaluate diverse sources from official papers. Furthermore, the writers then examine the implementation of SDG 5 using the indicators provided by Bappenas. The writers categorize the analysis based on human security elements and provides an assessment of the government's executed strategies. Finally, the writers believes that, overall, Indonesia's commitment to implementing the SDGs program from 2015 to 2021 did not meet the desired target, but it was ideal in certain targets and indicators.</p><p class="p1"><strong>Bahasa Indonesia Abstract:</strong> Penelitian ini membahas tentang komitmen pemerintah Indonesia dalam menjamin kesetaraan gender sebagai bagian dari SGDs nomor 5. Isu kesetaraan gender merupakan isu keamanan manusia yang menjadi fokus pembangunan Indonesia. Sehingga komitmen dan keseriusan Indonesia perlu dievaluasi untuk menjamin tercapainya target-target dalam SDGs yang sudah disepakati. Dalam mengevaluasi dan menganalisa komitmen Indonesia, penulis menggunakan konsep SDGs dan Keamanan Manusia sebagai alat analisis. Penulis menggunakan tujuh elemen keamanan manusia berdasarkan UNDP dalam mengklasifikasikan target-target yang tercantum dalam SDGs nomor 5. Kemudian, penulis memaparkan strategi dan kapasitas yang diperlukan dalam mengatasi keamanan manusia sesuai elemennya. Penulis juga menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan content analysis dimana para peneliti mengkaji berbagai sumber dari dokumen resmi. Kemudian penulis menganalisa implementasi SDGs nomor 5 menggunakan indikator yang sudah disediakan oleh Bappenas. Penulis mengelompokkan analisa berdasarkan elemen keamanan manusia dan memberikan evaluasi strategi pemerintah yang sudah dijalankan. Terakhir penulis menyimpulkan bahwa Komitmen Indonesia dalam menjalankan program SDGs sejak tahun 2015 hingga 2021 dapat dikatakan belum sesuai target yang diinginkan secara umum, namun sudah sempurna di beberapa target dan indikator.</p>

<p><strong><br /></strong></p><p class="p2"><span class="s1"> </span>The primary goal of this paper is to provide insight into the factors that have contributed to the trade war between the United States of America and China, which has been influenced not only by the economic sector but also by AI. Furthermore, in light of China's rising power, which threatens to supplant US supremacy, as well as its ambition to become a global leader in artificial intelligence by 2030, the steps taken by the United States during the Donald Trump administration to maintain its global influence are discussed in this paper. Furthermore, there is an indication that China is aiming to boost its global influence, which will be the focus of this paper with due attention to the national artificial intelligence advancement. The desire for both China and the United States to dominate technology has increased competition between the two countries, as evidenced by the numerous technological innovations developed and released by the two countries in recent years. In addition, the authors will conduct empirical case study research in conjunction with comparative analysis. Thus, to investigates this issue through the lens of threat perception, which also serves as a theoretical framework. Lastly, the authors conclude that the advancement of China’s Artificial Intelligence is perceived as a threat for the US national security especially in military and political sector.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></p><p><strong>Keywords : </strong>Artificial Intelligence; Threat Perception; National Security</p>

Since the fall of the Shah, the US-Iran relations have changed significantly. During the Shah regime, US-Iran experience a warm relationship through economic and military partnerships, however, it changed since the Iran revolution until today. Iran turned out to be one of the axis of evil during the Bush administration. The fall of the Shah also changes the direction of the foreign policy of the US. It then led to the proposition of whether the US foreign policy has been more anti-Iranian than pro-Arab with the fall of the Shah. This paper seeks to answer this question through historical analysis. It examines the US policy during the Cold War era and the post-Cold War. Therefore, the US policy in the region is not always anti-Iranian than the pro-Arab case. The changed regional architecture influences the priorities of the President of the US at that time to put aside Iran's issue, as it happened on George H.W. Bush, Clinton, and Obama administration. Thus, the characteristic of the leader also heavily influences US posture in Iran, as Bush and Trump's personality and policies are clearly against Iran. However, despite the dynamic relations of the US-Iran, Iran has always been one of the threats for the US interest in the Persian Gulf since the Shah has fallen.

<p>AEGIS Journal of International Relations is a bi-annual journal which publishes articles on issues, events and discourses in International Relations on the bases of the broadening scope in the discipline. As the world is moving toward one borderless village due to the globalization which replaced the Cold War in 1989, the nature and characteristics of IR is dramatically changing and so has been the academic scope of the discipline. Among the new characteristics of the IR in the globalization are the interconnected of local and global, both events and issues, and the prominent important of international organization, which has been growing in numbers, membership and roles.</p>