Retears occurred infrequently in the late postoperative period (after 3 months) in well-healed tendons that had shown intact cuff repair integrity with sufficient mechanical and biological healing within the first 3 postoperative months.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify the relationship between an acromion index (AI) and the size of a rotator cuff tear. The hypothesis of our study was that an AI will be higher in patients with a full-thickness tear than in patients with a partial-thickness articular-side tear, and that it can be used as a predictor for the size of a rotator cuff tear. Methods We included 284 patients who had been diagnosed with rotator cuff tears and had undergone arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our institute. All patients were divided into five distinct groups (partial-thickness articular side tear, and four subgroups of full-thickness tears) depending on the size of the rotator cuff tear on arthroscopy. In each patient, an AI was measured on the pre-operative oblique coronal MR images and then analysed to determine the difference between groups. Results There were statistically significant differences between the partial-thickness articular side rotator cuff tear and large-tomassive rotator cuff tear groups (p<0.01), and the mean value of an AI was highest in the large-sized full-thickness tear group. The AI of the partial-thickness articular-side rotator cuff tear group was statistically different from the large-to-massive rotator cuff tear groups. ConclusionsThe AI can be a predictor which can differentiate a partial-thickness articular-side tear and a large-to-massive rotator cuff tear pre-operatively. However the AI could not provide useful guidance on predicting the differences in tear size in full-thickness tear patients. We suggest that a high AI can be one of the associated factors for progression to large-to-massive rotator cuff tears in a rotator cuff disease.

Background Closed tendinous mallet finger can be treated non-operatively by extension splinting of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) for 6 to 8 weeks. However, method of conservative treatment in detail differs among various reports, especially in type of orthosis, duration of full-time immobilization and additional night orthotic wear after full-time immobilization. In our institution, full-time Stack splint is applied with distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) in extension for 12 weeks and night orthosis is worn for 4 weeks. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes of tendinous mallet finger using our treatment protocol. Patients and Methods Between March 2007 and December 2017, patients with tendinous mallet finger who were managed conservatively according to our treatment protocol were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 100 patients (101 cases) were enrolled, including 77 males and 23 females. Extension lag was measured before, soon after treatment, and at the final follow-up. Flexion angle of DIP joint was measured at the final follow-up. Patients were clinically evaluated based on the Crawford classification scale and Abouna & Brown criteria. Results The mean age of patients was 40 years and the mean follow-up was 48 months. The mean extension lag was 28.3 degrees initially and 2.6 degrees at the final follow-up. (p-value < 0.001) Flexion angle at the final follow-up was 68.3 degrees. Based on the Crawford classification scale, 56 % of patients had excellent results, and 25 % of patients had good results. According to Abouna & Brown criteria, 78 % of patients had success results and 7.5 % of patients had improved results. Conclusions Wearing orthosis for up to 16 weeks (12 weeks full time and 4 weeks night orthosis) in the treatment of tendinous mallet finger injuries can achieve satisfying result.