In the interest of a more thorough understanding of the relationship between sample deposition technique and the quality of data obtained using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry, details of the electrospray (ES) process of sample deposition are investigated using a number of techniques. Sample morphology was observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), while matrix-enhanced secondary ion mass spectrometry (MESIMS) monitored surface coverage. Electrospray deposition reduces the analyte segregation that can occur during traditional dried droplet deposition for MALDI. We attribute statistically significant improvements in the reproducibility of signal intensity and MALDI average molecular mass measurements to the ES sample deposition technique.

ABSTRACT:As waterborne emulsions continue to replace their solvent-based counterparts in various applications, the water resistance of cast films is attracting significant interest. The characterization of the water sorption kinetics and structure-property relationships related to water sorption is, therefore, an important area for investigation. In this study, the water sorption kinetics of emulsion blends were compared with those of their blend components. The investigated blends were at equal weight (dry basis) fractions for each emulsion. The initial water sorption rate for immiscible emulsion blends was found to be significantly higher than composite values of the constituents. This behavior was due to percolation networks in the blends because thermodynamic constraints prevented diffusion across the interface bordering dissimilar particles, leaving a interface enriched with water-sensitive species. The peak water sorption for the immiscible emulsion blends was lower than the composite values because of the ability of the water-sensitive species to rapidly diffuse out of the samples due to the percolation network. This behavior existed for room-temperature-cast samples and persisted as the time and temperature exposure was increased. Atomic force microscopy results clearly showed the potential for percolation networks in the blends. Higher glass-transition emulsion polymers [e.g., poly(vinyl acetate)] exhibited similar behavior, and this indicated poor film formation like that for the immiscible emulsion blends. These results indicated that the degree of film formation was critical with respect to the water sorption characteristics of emulsion films. Immiscible emulsion blends were compared with miscible emulsion blends for which all constituents exhibited excellent film formation (unblended). The immiscible blends exhibited a significant difference in water sorption compared with the miscible blends because of the existence of percolation networks.