Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers use tracking loops to lock onto GNSS signals. Fixed loop settings limit the tracking performance against noise, receiver dynamics, and the current scenario. Adaptive tracking loops adjust these settings to achieve optimal performance for a given scenario. This paper evaluates the performance and complexity of state-of-the-art adaptive scalar tracking techniques used in modern digital GNSS receivers. Ideally, a tracking channel should be adjusted to both noisy and dynamic environments for optimal performance, defined by tracking precision and loop robustness. The difference between the average tracking jitter of the discriminator’s output and the square-root Cramér-Rao bound (CRB) indicates the loops’ tracking capability. The ability to maintain lock characterizes the robustness in highly dynamic scenarios. From a system perspective, the average lock indicator is chosen as a metric to measure the performance in terms of precision, whereas the average number of visible satellites being tracked indicates the system’s robustness against dynamics. The average of these metrics’ product at different noise levels leads to a reliable system performance metric. Adaptive tracking techniques, such as the fast adaptive bandwidth (FAB), the fuzzy logic (FL), and the loop-bandwidth control algorithm (LBCA), facilitate a trade-off for optimal performance. These adaptive tracking techniques are implemented in an open software interface GNSS hardware receiver. All three methods steer a third-order adaptive phase locked loop (PLL) and are tested in simulated scenarios emulating static and high-dynamic vehicular conditions. The measured tracking performance, system performance, and time complexity of each algorithm present a detailed analysis of the adaptive techniques. The results show that the LBCA with a piece-wise linear approximation is above the other adaptive loop-bandwidth tracking techniques while preserving the best performance and lowest time complexity. This technique achieves superior static and dynamic system performance being 1.5 times more complex than the traditional tracking loop.
This paper evaluates the performance of robust adaptive tracking techniques with the direct-state Kalman filter (DSKF) used in modern digital global navigation satellite system (GNSS) receivers. Under the assumption of a well-known Gaussian distributed model of the states and the measurements, the DSKF adapts its coefficients optimally to achieve the minimum mean square error (MMSE). In time-varying scenarios, the measurements’ distribution changes over time due to noise, signal dynamics, multipath, and non-line-of-sight effects. These kinds of scenarios make difficult the search for a suitable measurement and process noise model, leading to a sub-optimal solution of the DSKF. The loop-bandwidth control algorithm (LBCA) can adapt the DSKF according to the time-varying scenario and improve its performance significantly. This study introduces two methods to adapt the DSKF using the LBCA: The LBCA-based DSKF and the LBCA-based lookup table (LUT)-DSKF. The former method adapts the steady-state process noise variance based on the LBCA’s loop bandwidth update. In contrast, the latter directly relates the loop bandwidth with the steady-state Kalman gains. The presented techniques are compared with the well-known state-of-the-art carrier-to-noise density ratio (C/N0)-based DSKF. These adaptive tracking techniques are implemented in an open software interface GNSS hardware receiver. For each implementation, the receiver’s tracking performance and the system performance are evaluated in simulated scenarios with different dynamics and noise cases. Results confirm that the LBCA can be successfully applied to adapt the DSKF. The LBCA-based LUT-DSKF exhibits superior static and dynamic system performance compared to other adaptive tracking techniques using the DSKF while achieving the lowest complexity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.