Background: Docetaxel (DT) is an extensively used taxane, frequently associated with hypersensitivity reactions. The aim of this study was to record the epidemiological and clinical features of hypersensitivity to DT in non-small cell lung cancer patients in order to obtain useful information concerning the management of these patients. We also developed a desensitization protocol and evaluated its clinical application. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed records of 620 non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with DT-containing regimens in the adjuvant, first-, second- or next-line setting. Data from 102 patients who had exhibited hypersensitivity reactions were analyzed according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Five patients were chosen for the desensitization protocol. We applied the standard protocol for parenteral desensitization to β-lactam antibiotics, and DT treatment was carried out with a series of 10-fold dilutions in sufficient volume to administer the total dose. Results: One hundred and two patients (16.5%) were recorded as having hypersensitivity to DT. Reactions were observed after approximately 2.5 ± 1.0 cycles. Only 14 patients (14/620, 2%) developed grade 3–4 hypersensitivity. Reactions were more likely in patients during second- or third-line chemotherapy, but no other correlation (age, gender, atopic status) was observed. Five patients completed a parenteral desensitization protocol and continued their treatment uneventfully. Conclusions: Hypersensitivity reactions to DT respond quickly to discontinuation along with appropriate supportive care. Premedication and increased infusion time may allow readministration. The desensitization protocol that we developed provides a reliable alternative to permanent discontinuation of DT.

With 69 years being the median age at diagnosis in the United States, management of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a common problem faced by the oncology practitioner. We evaluated a biweekly administration of the combination regimen using docetaxel (Sanofi Aventis, Athens) and gemcitabine (Eli Lilly, Athens) in a phase II study (objective response rate, median survival, median response duration and safety). A total of 198 cycles were administered to 38 patients with advanced NSCLC with a median age of 72 years (range 65-85 years). Patients received docetaxel 80 mg/m(2 )and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m (2 )on days 1 and 14 of a 28-day cycle. Twenty patients achieved a partial response (PR) (20/34, 58.8%), 4 patients had stable disease (SD) (4/34, 11.7%) and 10 (10/34, 29.4%) had progressive disease (PD). The median time to disease progression was 3 months (range 1-11 months) with a mean survival of 7 months (range 1-29 months). Hematological and non-hematological toxic effects were generally mild to moderate and manageable: grade 3 neurotoxicity and grade 3 allergy occurred in 5 patients (13.1%) and 1 patient (2.6%), respectively. Peripheral neuropathy, mostly grades 1 and 2, was reported in 29 patients (76.3%), which was seen more frequently in patients >70 years of age (P=0.048).We conclude that the biweekly administration of a docetaxel/gemcitabine combination with G-CSF support constitutes a tolerable and convenient regimen for the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC, with efficacy similar to that reported in other regimens. Hence, this two-drug combination appears promising and warrants further evaluation.

No abstract

Giant reactions to the tuberculin skin test are extremely rare and have been previously reported almost exclusively in patients with lepromatous leprosy. We herein report a giant tuberculin reaction associated with the homeopathic drug Tuberculinum in a patient with no evidence of active tuberculosis or leprosy.

BackgroundChest radiation is a common therapeutic approach in the management of lung cancer, as well as in other malignancies, rendering radiation-induced pneumonitis a rather commonly reported adverse event. A large proportion of patients undergoing radiation have underlying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We aim to elucidate the pathogenetic pathways implicated in radiation-induced pneumonitis particularly in this subgroup of patients.MethodsA literature search was performed in PubMed to identify relative studies published until June 2011.ResultsThe incidence of radiation-induced pneumonitis after conventional irradiation in COPD is about 7 to 10% in the moderate although symptomatic forms and about 1 to 3% in the severe forms. Radiation-induced pneumonitis seems to be an acute-phase reaction, taking primarily place in the most radiosensitive subunit of the lung, the alveolar/capillary complex. Reactive oxygen species, generated by radiation, initiate a cascade of molecular events that alter the cytokine milieu of the microenvironment, creating inflammation and chronic oxidative stress. COPD is characterized by a chronic inflammatory state in the lung, also generating reactive oxidant species. Biological markers intrinsic to the patient, such as early variations of certain cytokines (IL-6, IL-10, TGF-β) seem to be implicated and studies are under way to determine their role. The standard dose-volume metrics, such as V20, V13 and mean lung dose, are major factors influencing the clinical course of radiation-induced pneumonitis.ConclusionsUnderstanding the underlying pathogenesis of radiation-induced pneumonitis may help improve optimal delivery of treatment plans, minimize the risks and increasing the therapeutic ratio in patients with COPD.