A substantial number of patients were exposed to risk factors for QT prolongation; and QT prolonging drugs such as proton pump inhibitors, antimicrobials and diuretics which may lead to serious outcomes.
Background Antisynthetase syndrome is a relatively uncommon entity, and can be easily missed if not specifically looked for in adults whose initial presentation is with interstitial lung disease. Its presentation with interstitial lung disease alters its prognosis. Case presentation This case report describes a 27-year-old Pakistani, Asian man, a medical student, with no previous comorbidities or significant family history who presented with a 3 months’ history of low grade fever and lower respiratory tract infections, associated with exertional dyspnea, arthralgias, and gradual weight loss. During these 3 months, he had received multiple orally administered antibiotics for suspected community-acquired pneumonia. When he presented to us, he was pale and febrile. A chest examination was significant for bi-basal end-inspiratory crackles. Preliminary investigations revealed raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate. High resolution computed tomography of his chest showed fine ground-glass attenuation in posterior basal segments of both lower lobes suggestive of interstitial lung disease. He was started on dexamethasone, to which he responded and showed improvement. However, during the course of events, he developed progressive proximal muscle weakness. Further investigations revealed raised creatinine phosphokinase and lactate dehydrogenase. A thorough autoimmune profile was carried out which showed positive anti-Jo-1 antibodies in high titers. A muscle biopsy was consistent with inflammatory myopathy. Clinical, radiological, serological, and histopathological markers aided in making the definitive diagnosis of antisynthetase syndrome. Antisynthetase syndrome is a variant of polymyositis but with visceral involvement, that is, interstitial lung disease and positive anti-Jo-1 antibodies. Our patient responded very well to glucocorticoids and azathioprine. Conclusion Antisynthetase syndrome is a rare clinical entity which apart from clinical presentation requires specific serological investigations for diagnosis. Concomitant association of interstitial lung disease gives it a guarded prognosis.
Amongst the different clinical and laboratory parameters used to Background: monitor disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), mean platelet volume (MPV) is a novel biomarker. Although MPV has been studied in other rheumatological conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, its role in adult SLE needs to be defined, especially in Pakistan.The aim of this study was to Methods: evaluate the role of MPV as a biomarker of disease activity in SLE. Fifty patients were recruited through a consecutive non-probability sampling technique for this cross-sectional study. On the basis of their SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) score of greater or lesser than 5, these 50 participants were divided into two equal groups respectively;25 patients with active SLE, and another 25 participants with stable, inactive lupus. MPV was measured in each group and compared using SPSS version 16. MPV was also correlated with SLEDAI and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Independent sample t-test and Pearson's correlation tests were applied. Sensitivity and specificity of MPV were checked through ROC analysis.The MPV of patients with Results: active SLE (n=25, mean [M]=7.12, SD=1.01) was numerically lower than those in the inactive-SLE group (n=25, M= 10.12, SD=0.97), and this was statistically significant ( <0.001). MPV had an inverse relationship with both ESR (r=-0.93, P <0.001) and SLEDAI (r= -0.94, <0.001). However, there was a strong P P positive correlation between ESR and SLEDAI (r=0.95, <0.001). For MPV, a P cutoff value of less than 8.5fl had a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 100% ( < 0.001).Higher disease activity in SLE is associated with a P Conclusions: correspondingly low MPV. Keywords
BackgroundPotential drug–drug interactions (pDDIs) are one of the preventable drug related problems having the risk of serious adverse events or therapeutic failure. In developing countries like Pakistan, this issue remains poorly addressed. The objective of this study was to explore prevalence of pDDIs in the Outpatient Department (OPD) of a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. The secondary aim was to describe the levels of reported pDDIs and develop a list of widespread clinically relevant interactions.MethodsPrescriptions of 2400 OPD patients were analyzed for pDDIs through Micromedex Drug-Reax®. Prevalence, severity- and documentation-levels and widespread clinically relevant interactions were reported.ResultsOf total 2400 prescriptions, pDDIs were present in 22.3%. Whereas, moderate- and major-pDDIs were found in 377 (15.7%) and 225 (9.4%), respectively. PDDIs were more prevalent in Medicine (9.2%) and Cardiology (2.6%) as compared with other OPD specialties. Total 942 pDDIs were identified, of which, the majority were either moderate- (61.9%) or major-pDDIs (32.1%). Some of the most common interactions were ibuprofen + levofloxacin (n = 50), ciprofloxacin + diclofenac (32), aspirin + atenolol (24), and diclofenac + levofloxacin (19). The potential adverse outcomes of widespread interactions were seizures, bleeding, QT-interval prolongation, arrhythmias, tendon rupture, hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia, serotonin syndrome, drug toxicity, and decreased therapeutic response.ConclusionsOPD patients were at risk to pDDIs, particularly to major- and moderate-pDDIs. Screening of prescriptions for pDDIs and monitoring of pharmacotherapy in terms of response and associated adverse drug events will contribute to patient safety.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-3579-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.