The use of hearing aid (HA) may improve the hearing performance and ease the perceived negative consequences of hearing difficulties in elderly individuals. The aim of this study was to determine the problems experienced by elderly individuals with HA and to investigate the factors that could increase the use of HA. A total of 122 female and 127 male patients with a mean age of 76.79 ± 6.91 years who were recommended HA were evaluated. The following details were taken from the patients: age, gender, duration of hearing complaint, whether or not they received HA, number of family members, number of hours they used HA in a day, type of device, number of ears with HA, educational status, whether they continued to work, whether they were tested before taking the device, the reasons for not taking HA, and the reasons that reduce their use of HA. A total of 18 patients did not receive HA for the following reasons: 9 considered HA too expensive, 8 thought it would be difficult to use HA, and 1 did not like it because of its appearance. No significant difference was found in the patients’ daily HA use duration, age, sex, number of immediate family members, education level, type of device, test before taking the device, and use of HA in single ear or bilateral ears. There was a significant difference in the daily HA use duration and whether the patients continued to work. We need to help reduce the problems associated with the use of HA to help older individuals have a more active role in society and help them in their health problems.

Sonographic scoring of thyroid nodules is an effective method for predicting malignancy. The authors suggest including associated pathologic node in the scoring criteria. Further studies with larger cohorts will provide more evidence about its importance in sonographic scoring.

Comparison of the Oral Steroids, Macrolides and Combination Therapy in Nasal Polyposis PatientsN asal polyps (NP) are benign and are characterised by mucosal inflammation and expansion into the lumen of the nasal cavity. They are typically pale grey protrusions and are induced by multifactorial causes. The prevalence in the general population ranges between 1 and 4%, and they mostly affect adult individuals. [1] These polyps have been known since ancient times, and yet the pathogenesis and treatment of NP remain to be fully elucidated. In recent years, NP has been considered to represent a sub-group of chronic sinusitis. [2] The most important factors in the development of nasal polyps are viewed as chronic inflammation and mucosal oedema. Other factors that may play a Objectives: In this study, our aim was to compare oral steroid therapy with macrolide therapy and with oral steroid + macrolide (combine) therapy in patients with nasal polyposis (NP). Methods: All patients were treated with nasal steroid therapy for eight weeks and divided randomly into three groups as follows: Oral steroid group, oral macrolide group and combine group. All patients underwent endoscopic staging, radiological grading, odour testing and completed the sino-nasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire before and after treatment. Results: Significant improvement was observed in all parameters after treatment in all three groups. All parameters were significantly better in the combined group than in the macrolide group. Comparison of the oral steroid group and macrolide group revealed significantly better radiological grading and odour test changes for the oral steroid group, but no statistically significant differences existed according to endoscopic staging and SNOT-22. The post-treatment SNOT-22 score was significantly better in the combined group than in the steroid group. A comparison of the combined and steroid groups showed better results for the combined group for all parameters, but the differences were not significant. Conclusion: All treatment protocols were effective and the successful use of macrolide indicates its potential as an alternative in patients with contraindications to oral steroid treatment. The combined treatment may demonstrate significantly better results than steroid treatment alone if larger studies with more patients are performed.

No abstract