The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a pandemic. Global health care now faces unprecedented challenges with widespread and rapid human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and high morbidity and mortality with COVID-19 worldwide. Across the world, medical care is hampered by a critical shortage of not only hand sanitizers, personal protective equipment, ventilators, and hospital beds, but also impediments to the blood supply. Blood donation centers in many areas around the globe have mostly closed. Donors, practicing social distancing, some either with illness or undergoing self-quarantine, are quickly diminishing. Drastic public health initiatives have focused on containment and “flattening the curve” while invaluable resources are being depleted. In some countries, the point has been reached at which the demand for such resources, including donor blood, outstrips the supply. Questions as to the safety of blood persist. Although it does not appear very likely that the virus can be transmitted through allogeneic blood transfusion, this still remains to be fully determined. As options dwindle, we must enact regional and national shortage plans worldwide and more vitally disseminate the knowledge of and immediately implement patient blood management (PBM). PBM is an evidence-based bundle of care to optimize medical and surgical patient outcomes by clinically managing and preserving a patient’s own blood. This multinational and diverse group of authors issue this “Call to Action” underscoring “The Essential Role of Patient Blood Management in the Management of Pandemics” and urging all stakeholders and providers to implement the practical and commonsense principles of PBM and its multiprofessional and multimodality approaches.

Background The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the introduction of a patient blood management (PBM) program in cardiac surgery on transfusion incidence and outcome. Study Design and Methods Clinical and transfusion data were compared between the pre‐PBM epoch (July 2006‐March 2007) and the PBM epoch (April 2007‐September 2012). Results There were a total of 2662 patients analyzed, 387 in the pre‐PBM and 2275 in the PBM epoch. Red blood cell (RBC) loss decreased from a mean (±SD) of 810 ± 426 mL (median, 721 mL) to 605 ± 369 mL (median, 552 mL; p < 0.001) and pretransfusion hemoglobin decreased from 7.2 ± 1.4 to 6.6 ± 1.2 g/dL (p < 0.001) in the pre‐PBM versus the PBM epoch. In conjunction, this resulted in a reduction of the RBC transfusion rate from 39.3% to 20.8% (p < 0.001). Similar reductions were observed for the transfusion of fresh‐frozen plasma (FFP; from 18.3% to 6.5%, p < 0.001) and platelets (PLTs; from 17.8% to 9.8%, p < 0.001). Hospital mortality and cerebral vascular accident incidence remained unchanged in the PBM epoch. However, the incidence of postoperative kidney injury decreased in the PMB epoch (from 7.6% to 5.0%, p = 0.039), length of hospital stay decreased from 12.2 ± 9.6 days (median, 10 days) to 10.4 ± 8.0 days (median, 8 days; p < 0.001), and total adjusted direct costs were reduced from $48,375 ± $28,053 (median, $39,709) to $44,300 ± $25,915 (median, $36,906; p < 0.001). Conclusions Implementing meticulous surgical technique, a goal‐directed coagulation algorithm, and a more restrictive transfusion threshold in combination resulted in a substantial decrease in RBC, FFP, and PLT transfusions; less kidney injury; a shorter length of hospital stay; and lower total direct costs.

Summary Patient Blood Management is the timely application of evidence‐based medical and surgical concepts designed to maintain hemoglobin concentration, optimize hemostasis, and minimize blood loss to improve patient outcomes. Conceptually similar to a “bundle” strategy, it is designed to improve clinical care using comprehensive evidence‐based treatment strategies to manage patients with potential or ongoing critical bleeding, bleeding diathesis, critical anemia, and/ or a coagulopathy. Patient Blood Management includes multimodal strategies to screen, diagnose and properly treat anemia, coagulopathies and minimize bleeding, using goal‐directed therapy and leverages a patient's physiologic ability to adapt to anemia while definitive treatment is undertaken. Allogeneic blood component transfusion is one traditional therapeutic modality out of many for managing blood loss and anemia and, while it may be the best choice in certain situations, other effective and more appropriate options are available and should be used in conjunction or alone. Therefore, comprehensive Patient Blood Management is the new standard of care to prevent and manage anemia and optimize hemostasis and has been recommended by the World Health Organization, the American Society of Anesthesiologists, the European Society of Anaesthesiology and the Australian National Blood Authority. While there is a plethora of expert consensus and good practice guidelines published for blood component transfusion from multiple professional organizations and societies, there remains a need for more comprehensive and broader standards of patient medical management to proactively reduce the risk of exposure to allogeneic transfusions. In 2010, the Society for Advancement of Blood Management published the first comprehensive standards to address the administrative and clinical components of an effective, patient‐centered Patient Blood Management program. Recognizing the need to reduce inappropriate transfusions, some professional organizations have placed their emphasis on transfusion guidelines. In contrast, the focus of the Society for Advancement of Blood Management Standard is on the centrality of the patient and the full spectrum of therapeutic strategies needed to improve clinical outcomes in patients at risk for blood loss or anemia, thereby reducing avoidable transfusions as well. The Standards are meant not to replace, but to complement transfusion guidelines by more completely addressing the need for a multi‐modal clinical approach with the goal to improve patient outcomes. Compared to adult programs, Pediatric Patient Blood Management programs are currently not commonly accepted as standard of care for pediatric patients. This is partly due to the fact that, until recently, there was a paucity of robust evidence‐based literature and expert consensus guidelines on pediatric PBM. Managing pediatric bleeding and blood product transfusion presents a unique set of challenges. The main goal of transfusion is to correct or avoid imminent inadequate oxygen c...

Anemia is an independent risk factor for adverse patient outcomes. There are no guidelines for management of anemia in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF), despite its high incidence. Four objectives were defined by the International Anemia Management and Clinical Outcomes Expert Panel (AMCO), a multinational group of interdisciplinary experts identified by the Society for the Advancement of Blood Management (SABM) to: determine the prevalence of anemia in outpatients; to determine the prevalence of hospital‐acquired anemia; to assess the impact of anemia management on clinical outcomes such as quality of life and functional status; and to provide recommendations for primary care physicians and specialists for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of anemia in patients with CHF. Anemia and iron deficiency were confirmed to be highly prevalent in patients with CHF. Intravenous iron therapy improves anemia, cardiac function and exercise tolerance, leading to improvement in quality of life. Anemia management has been demonstrated to be cost‐effective. Clinical care pathways to manage anemia in patients with CHF are recommended as best practices in order to improve patient outcomes. Am. J. Hematol. 92:88–93, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

No abstract