Purpose of the study: The objective of this study was to present useful practical advice on the process of designing questionnaires for student surveys for higher education quality, as well as conducting such survey through the analysis of results of such survey that was held in National University "Odesa Law Academy". Methodology: This research is based on the results of an anonymous online survey among 142 students of the Faculty of Advocacy of the National University "Odesa Law Academy", which was conducted in April 2017. The survey consisted of 29 questions. All questions were divided into 3 separate groups: assessment of academic discipline, assessment of lectures, and assessment of practical classes. Each group consisted of open-ended and closed-ended questions. Closed-ended questions were evaluated on a 10-point scale, where 1 is the lowest score, and 10 is the highest. Main Findings: The research findings demonstrate that to increase the response rate of student it's better to reduce the number of questionnaires and questions in them. Also, the authors stated that the online form of survey is better than paper form (in aspects of accessibility, anonymity, and convenience for students). It was found that the vast majority of students' responses were received during the first days of the survey, which indicates that it is impractical to be conducting such a survey over a long period. It was found that in response to closed-ended questions most students chose the highest mark (10 out of 10), so developers of questionnaires have to choose another scale for closed-ended question assessment which has some real references. Also, it was stated that only a fraction of open-ended questions will contain really useful information that can be further used to improve educational services. Application of this study: This research can be used by administration staff and teachers of universities as a guideline in conducting similar surveys. Novelty/Originality of this study: The novelty of this research lies in the attempt of combining relatively easy in implementation but quite effective in usage rules of conducting student’s survey on higher education quality in one paper.
Introduction: The provision of medical products of adequate quality should be considered as constituent element of the human right to life, inextricably linked with the right to health care protection and medical care. However, the Ukrainian market of counterfeit medical products affects the guaranteeing of the right to health care protection and medical care in Ukraine. The current situation necessitates a study of the legal regulation of counterfeiting of medical products in Ukraine and an increase in its effectiveness. The aim of the research is the formation of scientifically based approaches to improve the activities on counterfeiting of medical products in Ukraine in the aspect of normative regulation. Materials and methods: The empirical base of the research is the national legislation of Ukraine, data from the General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine and the Unified State Register of Court Decisions. The methodological basis is a set of general and special research methods of scientific cognition, namely: the logical and normative method; statistical method, as well as methods of comparative analysis and logical methods of research. Review: In the course of the research, the authors have analyzed international acts, national legislation of Ukraine determining the directions and specific features of the activities of state agencies in counterfeiting of medical products in Ukraine, the data of the General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine and the Unified State Register of Court Decisions. On the basis of the performed analysis, the authors have suggested measures aimed at increasing the effectiveness of counterfeiting of medical products. Conclusions: The imperfection of the existing system of counterfeiting of medical products in Ukraine has been proven. The authors have offered organizational measures to increase the effectiveness of counterfeiting of medical products, as well as to amend the current criminal, criminal and procedural legislation, taking into account the MEDICRIME Convention ratified in Ukraine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.