OBJECTIVES: Adult patients with cancer have a greater likelihood of developing severe illness and death from coronavirus disease 2019 compared with patients without cancer. We sought to characterize the clinical characteristics and outcomes of cancer patients who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and were admitted to the ICU at the peak of the first wave of the pandemic in the United States. DESIGN: A single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two medical-surgical ICUs of a tertiary-care cancer center. PATIENTS/SUBJECTS: All consecutive adult patients (≥ 18 yr) with current or past (< 2 yr) diagnosis of cancer who were admitted to the ICU with coronavirus disease 2019 between March 1, and June 30, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of 89 critically ill cancer patients were extracted from electronic medical records. Median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 57–70 yr), 66% were White, and 58% male. Approximately a third of patients had three or more comorbidities. Fifty-one patients (57%) had solid tumors, and 38 (42%) had hematologic malignancies. Sixty-one patients (69%) received cancer-directed therapy within the previous 90 days. Sixty patients (67%) required mechanical ventilation, 56% required prone positioning, 28% underwent tracheostomy, and 71% required vasopressors. Hospital mortality was 45% (40/89). Among those who required mechanical ventilation, mortality was 53% (32/60). Hospital mortality was significantly higher among patients with hematologic malignancies, higher severity of illness and organ failure scores, need for invasive mechanical ventilation and vasopressor therapy, lower hemoglobin and platelet count, and higher d-dimer levels at ICU admission. ICU and hospital length of stay were 10 and 26 days, respectively. At 9-month follow-up, the mortality rate was 54% (48/89). CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest case series and intermediate-term follow-up of cancer patients with coronavirus disease 2019 who were admitted to the ICU. Hospital mortality was 45%. Intermediate-term outcome after hospital discharge was favorable.

No abstract

Evidence for the effectiveness of attachment-based interventions in improving youth’s socioemotional health increases each year, yet potential for scalability of existing programs is limited. Available programs may have lower acceptability within low-income immigrant communities. Co-designing and implementing interventions with trained community workers (promotores) offers an appealing solution to multiple challenges, but community workers must have high investment in the program for this to be a workable solution. This study examines the experiences of promotores involved in the co-creation and delivery of an attachment-based intervention program for low-income Latinx youth (ages 8 to 17) and their mothers. Promotores (N=8) completed surveys, reporting on the experiences of each therapy group in terms of group dynamic (e.g., promotores’ connectedness to each group, perceived program relevance). Following the completion of the intervention study, promotores participated in interviews in which they described their experiences in co-creating the intervention, delivering the intervention to the community, and their recommendations for improving the intervention. Overall, promotores perceived group dynamics as positive, though the mother groups were evaluated as significantly higher in quality (e.g., lower conflict) than the youth groups. Interviews revealed that promotores enjoyed the co-creation process and identified important areas for improvements for the intervention (incorporation of more visuals, creation of age-limited groups, reducing number of youth sessions) and evaluation (reduction in length, modification of language). Integrating input from promotores in the process of co-creating and implementing an intervention can benefit every member of the community from the program participants to the providers themselves.

BackgroundDisasters have the potential to cause critical shortages of life-saving equipment. It has been postulated that during patient surge, multiple individuals could be maintained on a single ventilator. This was supported by a previous trial that showed one ventilator could support four sheep. The goal of our study is to investigate if cross contamination of pathological agents occurs between individuals on a shared ventilator with strategically placed antimicrobial filters.MethodsA multipatient ventilator circuit was assembled using four sterile, parallel standard tubing circuits attached to four 2 L anaesthesia bags, each representing a simulated patient. Each ‘patient’ was attached to a Heat and Moisture Exchange filter. An additional bacterial/viral filter was attached to each expiratory limb. ‘Patient-Lung’ number 1 was inoculated with an isolate of Serratia marcescens, and the circuit was run for 24 hours. Each ‘lung’ and three points in the expiratory limb tubing were washed with broth and cultured. All cultures were incubated for 48 hours with subcultures performed at 24 hours.ResultsWashed cultures of patient 2, 3 and 4 failed to demonstrate growth of S. marcescens. Cultures of the distal expiratory tubing, expiratory limb connector and expiratory limb prefilter tubing yielded no growth of S. marcescens at 24 or 48 hours.ConclusionBased on this circuit configuration, it is plausible to maintain four individuals on a single ventilator for 24 hours without fear of cross contamination.