The aim of this study was to investigate experimentally the fatigue and stability of three bar materials with distal extension at the molar region and to numerically analyse the biomechanical properties of the bar materials connected to overdentures in a patient individual model. A milled bar was designed for the mandible on four implants in the canine and second premolar region. Three bar materials were investigated: titanium (Ti), cobalt chromium (CoCr), and polyetherketonketon (PEKK). Firstly, static and fatigue tests were performed based on EN ISO 14801 in a commercial permanent loading set-up. Unilateral axial force was applied on the distal extension of the bars. Secondly, numerical models were created. Different bar materials and loading scenarios were analysed. The static fracture limit of the three materials was 1,750 N, 780 N, 310 N for Ti, CoCr, and PEKK, respectively. The Wöhler curves showed comparable fatigue limits of 200 N, 160 N, and 150 N for titanium, CoCr, and PEKK, respectively. The stress at the distal extension was 2,600 MPa (Ti), 1,000 MPa (CoCr), and 270 MPa (PEKK). All loading simulations with the PEKK bar showed higher stresses in the implants and in the bone bed as well as higher displacements of the over denture in comparison to metal bars. PEKK showed different mechanical behaviour compared to Ti and CoCr. The distribution of stresses within the PEKK bar was wider than the area of loading which probably leads to fatigue of the whole bar and not only the part under load.
Objectives The aim of the study was to determine differences between Locator and CM LOC attachment systems regarding patient satisfaction and wear of the abutments and their inserts. Plaque accumulation onto the polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) framework and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was investigated for the implant-supported overdentures. Methods Seventeen edentulous patients were randomised to receive either Locator or CM LOC system for the first year. The total number of implants was 53. After the randomisation, 25 implants received Locator system, and 28 implants received CM LOC system in the first year. After a period of 12 months, the attachment system was exchanged from either Locator to CM LOC or vice versa. Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) questionnaires were used to evaluate patient satisfaction, chewing comfort, and pressure lesions. Prosthesis hygiene on the PMMA and PEKK surfaces was evaluated by using Stark plaque index. After the exchange of the abutments, they were stored until the end of the 24 months, and the surface wear of the abutments was analysed using a scanning electron microscope. Results Three patients (10 implants) died shortly before the end of the first year. Two patients (7 implants) received only Locator system since CM LOC was not indictable for their implant system. Patient’s satisfaction was increased when the attachment system was changed from Locator to CM LOC after 12 months of wearing time. Chewing ability and comfort were increased when the attachment system was changed from CM LOC to Locator after 12-month wearing time. There was no influence of the change of the attachment system on pressure lesions. The observed plaque accumulation was higher on the PMMA than on the PEKK surface. For the 8 investigated Locator abutments, the wear was within low and middle level. For the 28 investigated CM LOC abutments, the wear was within middle and high level for the terminal implants and between low and middle for the central implants (for patients who received 4 implants). Conclusions Patient’s satisfaction and wearing comfort can be improved with implant-supported overdentures with CM LOC abutments in comparison to Locator. There was no clear difference between both attachment systems concerning the chewing ability of the patients. Plaque accumulation was observed on both attachment systems in different areas. Plaque accumulation on PEKK surface was less than on PMMA surface. Clinical relevance The CM LOC attachment system offers stable and comfortable wearing conditions for implant-supported overdentures. The use of PEKK as a framework material could reduce the incidence of pressure lesions.
A finite element analysis was used to determine the loading behavior of a full “All‐on‐4” bridge in the maxilla made from different framework materials. The model was generated based on data from an edentulous maxilla. Four implants were positioned according to the All‐on‐4 concept and a full arch restoration was created on top of the implants. Separate thrust dies were modeled directly above each of the units of the bridge. Forces of 500 N were applied to each thrust die separately. Simulations were repeated with the following variations and results were compared to determine the influence of each variation: point of force application (from tooth 16 to 26), framework material (high performance polymer HPP, titanium Ti, cobalt chromium CoCr), and healing state of the bone/implant interface. Depending on the point of force application, the bone below the HPP framework showed increased stresses (median: 180 MPa at 13) compared to the CoCr and Ti frameworks (110 MPa at 16) under immediate loading. After osseointegration, the framework material had no obvious influence on the stresses in the bone. In the osseointegrated state, maximum stresses are decreased by the tenfold. Stresses in the framework were clearly decreased with HPP compared to CoCr and Ti (75, 125, 115 MPa). Loading the anterior teeth induced higher stresses than loading the molar region due to torsional deformation. This effect increased with decreasing framework material stiffness. The framework stiffness had less distinct influence on the stresses in the restoration than the point of force application.
Objectives The aim of this study was, firstly, to analyse the long-time fatigue behaviour of crowns constructed from a novel polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) polymer, using artificial prepared teeth. Secondly, to determine the effect of the material’s stiffness that used as an artificial prepared tooth on the fatigue life of the PEKK crowns in comparison to human prepared teeth. Methods Veneered crowns with a PEKK framework were constructed on three different prepared teeth: artificial polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) teeth, artificial CoCr teeth and extracted human teeth. As far as applicable, the loading protocol was based on EN ISO 14801:2007 for fatigue testing of dental implants. After initial static fracture tests on three specimens from each group, the remaining crowns were loaded with different force levels until fracture or until 2 × 106 loading cycles were reached. The number of loading cycles until failure was recorded. Wöhler curves were created to display the fatigue limits. Results Static fracture limits as well as fatigue limits differed for all three core materials. The static fracture tests resulted in fracture limits of 1200 (± 293) N for the PMMA group, 1330 (± 219) N for the CoCr group and 899 (± 96) N for the human tooth group. Fatigue limits of 770 N, 840 N and 720 N were determined for the PMMA group, CoCr group and human tooth group, respectively. Conclusions The determined fatigue limit of above 720 N (depending on the core material) is sufficiently high and a good performance of this crown material is expected in the clinical loading life. The results showed that using artificial teeth instead of natural teeth for fatigue testing of crowns might result in an overestimation of the fatigue limits of the crown material. Clinical relevance PEKK-made crowns offer a stable and priceworthy treatment for patients, in particular those that suffer from metal allergy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.