No abstract

SummaryImportant Bird and Biodiversity Areas (IBAs) are sites identified as being globally important for the conservation of bird populations on the basis of an internationally agreed set of criteria. We present the first review of the development and spread of the IBA concept since it was launched by BirdLife International (then ICBP) in 1979 and examine some of the characteristics of the resulting inventory. Over 13,000 global and regional IBAs have so far been identified and documented in terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems in almost all of the world’s countries and territories, making this the largest global network of sites of significance for biodiversity. IBAs have been identified using standardised, data-driven criteria that have been developed and applied at global and regional levels. These criteria capture multiple dimensions of a site’s significance for avian biodiversity and relate to populations of globally threatened species (68.6% of the 10,746 IBAs that meet global criteria), restricted-range species (25.4%), biome-restricted species (27.5%) and congregatory species (50.3%); many global IBAs (52.7%) trigger two or more of these criteria. IBAs range in size from < 1 km2 to over 300,000 km2 and have an approximately log-normal size distribution (median = 125.0 km2, mean = 1,202.6 km2). They cover approximately 6.7% of the terrestrial, 1.6% of the marine and 3.1% of the total surface area of the Earth. The launch in 2016 of the KBA Global Standard, which aims to identify, document and conserve sites that contribute to the global persistence of wider biodiversity, and whose criteria for site identification build on those developed for IBAs, is a logical evolution of the IBA concept. The role of IBAs in conservation planning, policy and practice is reviewed elsewhere. Future technical priorities for the IBA initiative include completion of the global inventory, particularly in the marine environment, keeping the dataset up to date, and improving the systematic monitoring of these sites.

The foraging plasticity in a pelagic seabird species, Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea, was compared during incubation and chick-rearing among 7 different breeding sites in the North Atlantic. These sites, with contrasting ecological conditions, were situated in the Azores (Corvo, Faial, Graciosa and Sta. Maria), Berlengas (Berlenga), Madeira (Desertas) and Selvagens (Selvagem Grande) archipelagos. Behavioural data were obtained by intensively deploying compasstemperature and temperature-depth data loggers, monitoring 302 and 22 foraging excursions, respectively. A principal component analysis revealed 2 main groups, one foraging along a neritic shelf (Berlengas population) and the other foraging in pelagic oceanic areas (populations from Azores, Madeira and Selvagens). There was a significant positive correlation (r S = 0.55) between the percentage of short foraging trips in the different breeding sites and the concentration of chlorophyll-a in the waters surrounding those sites. Birds exploiting neritic areas used shallower depths (4.9 ± 2.3 m) and shorter dives (17.0 ± 2.2 s) than birds feeding in oceanic waters (9.8 ± 2.4 m and 32.0 ± 5.8 s respectively). This indicates that birds adapted their modes of predation to cope with the diverse distribution of their prey items. Overall, the behavioural response of the different populations was mainly dictated by the heterogeneity of their habitat, which was driven by 2 productivity gradients present in the north Atlantic. (1) Productivity is expected to increase from the subtropical warmer waters close to Selvagens to northern colder waters north of the Azores archipelago. (2) Oceanic environments are expected to be less profitable than coastal areas (upwelling areas), such as the Portuguese and African coasts. KEY WORDS: Data loggers · Ecological plasticity · Environmental heterogeneity · Foraging behaviour · SeabirdResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher

The conservation of threatened seabirds that are highly pelagic, such as the gadfly petrels Pterodroma spp., depends on understanding the main oceanographic determinants of their movements in order to apply the necessary management regulations and to identify and protect their key marine habitats. The present work presents for the first time information on the distribution and habitat preferences of 17 Bugio petrels Pterodroma deserta from the island of Bugio, Madeira archipelago, North Atlantic Ocean. All of the birds remained in North Atlantic waters during the pre-laying exodus, incubation and chick-rearing periods, showing a clear preference for deep, productive (high chlorophyll a levels) waters north of the Azores archipelago. There was high individual variability in migration strategies. Five wintering areas were identified: two off the Brazilian coast, one around the Cape Verde archipelago, one off the southeast coast of the United States, and one in pelagic waters in the central South Atlantic. These tended to be areas of high productivity but not of a particular sea surface temperature regime. Based on saltwater immersion data, birds were more active during the breeding season and spent more time resting on the water in wintering areas. There was also a positive correlation between the time spent on the water and the progression of full to new moon, suggesting that the birds may use moonlight to search for prey. Given its highly dispersed distribution at sea throughout the year, effective conservation of this threatened species may require management at large spatial scales.

Abstract1. Effective prevention and control of invasive species generally relies on a comprehensive, coherent and representative list of species that enables resources to be used optimally. European Union (EU) Regulation 1143/2014 on invasive alien species (IAS) aims to control or eradicate priority species, and to manage pathways to prevent the introduction and establishment of new IAS; it applies to species considered of Union concern and subject to formal risk assessment. So far, 49 species have been listed but the criteria for selecting species for risk assessment have not been disclosed and were probably unsystematic.2. We developed a simple method to systematically rank IAS according to their maximum potential threat to biodiversity in the EU. We identified 1,323 species as potential candidates for listing, and evaluated them against their invasion stages and reported impacts, using information from databases and scientific literature. 4. Policy implications. We propose a systematic, proactive approach to selecting and prioritising IAS for risk assessment to assist European Union policy implementation.We assess an unprecedented number of species with potential to harm EU This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.