The trend of simultaneous use of media device, more and more apparent among media users, draws the attention of socio-humanist oriented researchers who find positive, but also highly negative effects of this phenomenon. In the academic and everyday discourse, this phenomenon is called media multitasking or divided attention phenomenon. In this paper a small scale explorative research conducted among students on their usage of media and multitasking habits was presented. The research sample is made of 123 examinees, mainly Communicology and journalism department students of the Faculty of Philosophy in Niš. The research was conducted by using the data collected through the questioner created for the purpose of this analysis. The questioner consisted of 6 statements, and the task for the participants was to select ones that describe their behavior connected to the media usage. One of the major findings is that the main motive for simultaneous use of media is the desire to find out and achieve the most in as little time as possible. Also, students are motivated by the very fact they own multiple medias as well as habit and boredom. Usage of more then one media at the same time is most present during the day, and media content that evokes it the most are commercials.
Из перспективе драмске педагогије, у овом раду се издвајају два основна правца у примени драмских и/или позоришних техника у образовном контексту, који се првенствено разликују по томе ко их примењује у непосредном раду са децом и младима-наставници или професионални глумци. Затим се у оквиру сваког правца издвајају најутицајнији приступи појединих аутора. Иако постоје одређене сличности међу њима, овим радом се жели указати и на њихове разлике, које се огледају у теоријској, педагошкој и практичној оријентацији. У том контексту, посебно се издвајају мишљења о значају драмске уметности у образовању, о ефектима који се различитим приступима могу постићи, указује се на богатство избора и начина примене драмских и позоришних техника, а самим тим и на различите улоге, нивое и начине партиципације учесника. Значај ове тематике види се у прилици да се промовише драмска педагогија, која у нашој земљи није на завидном нивоу развијености, упркос чињеници да се многи наши аутори баве теоријским и/или практичним радом у овој области.
The media have always had great influence on the construction of attitudes and opinions of the public, thus it comes as no surprise that they constantly adjust to contemporary tides and the ways in which the public obtains information. Thanks to the popularity and possibilities offered by the Internet, the media were forced to converge towards online forms of reporting. Besides this, the Internet enabled the removal of state limits when it comes to informing, so the public can learn more easily about events from all over the world. In this way, mass-media communication gets new outlines while directing social tides on the global level. Although such a trend can be useful, it can also carry certain dangers. Therefore, the new media can become a platform for international conflicts and lead to possible interruption of good relations among states. Considering the fact that relations between Serbia and Croatia are characterised by a now concluded war, this paper examines the way in which the Serbian and the Croatian online media report on the relationship between the two states from the perspective of political relations, media presentations of each other, as well as how large the role of the modern media is in provoking new conflicts. Using a quantitative-qualitative analysis of the content, both the Serbian and the Croatian versions of the portal “24 hours” were analysed within the period from April 1 to April 30, 2017.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.