The canyon and twofold depression, major surface depressions, are predicted to be the primary and secondary receptor-binding sites on CVB3, respectively. Neutralizing immunogenic sites are predicted to lie on the extreme surfaces of the capsid at sites that lack amino acid sequence conservation among the CVBs. The ions located on the icosahedral threefold and fivefold axes together with the pocket factor may contribute to the pH stability of the coxsackieviruses.

We conjecture that the binding of the receptor to HRV16 can occur only when the pocket is temporarily empty, when it is possible for the canyon floor to be deformed downwards into the pocket. We further propose that the role of the pocket factor is to stabilize virus in transit from one host cell to the next, and that binding of ICAM-1 traps the pocket in the empty state, destabilizing the virus as required for uncoating.

The observation of a partially occupied hydrophobic pocket in HRV16 forms a missing link between HRV14, which is always observed with no pocket factor in the native form, and rhinovirus 1A and other picornaviruses (e.g. poliovirus, coxsackievirus) which contain pocket factors. The pocket factor molecules probably regulate viral entry, uncoating and assembly. Picornavirus assembly is known to proceed via pentamers, therefore, the interaction of RNA with the conserved tryptophan residues across twofold axes between pentamers may play a role in picornavirus assembly. The positioning of a cation on the icosahedral fivefold axes and the structure of the N termini of VP4 and VP1 around these axes suggest a mechanism for the uncoating of rhinoviruses.

The structure of Mengo virus, a representative member of the cardio picornaviruses, is substantially different from the structures of rhino- and polioviruses. The structure of Mengo virus was solved with the use of human rhinovirus 14 as an 8 A resolution structural approximation. Phase information was then extended to 3 A resolution by use of the icosahedral symmetry. This procedure gives promise that many other virus structures also can be determined without the use of the isomorphous replacement technique. Although the organization of the major capsid proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3 of Mengo virus is essentially the same as in rhino- and polioviruses, large insertions and deletions, mostly in VP1, radically alter the surface features. In particular, the putative receptor binding "canyon" of human rhinovirus 14 becomes a deep "pit" in Mengo virus because of polypeptide insertions in VP1 that fill part of the canyon. The minor capsid peptide, VP4, is completely internal in Mengo virus, but its association with the other capsid proteins is substantially different from that in rhino- or poliovirus. However, its carboxyl terminus is located at a position similar to that in human rhinovirus 14 and poliovirus, suggesting the same autocatalytic cleavage of VP0 to VP4 and VP2 takes place during assembly in all these picornaviruses.

The binding to human rhinovirus 14 of a series of eight antiviral agents that inhibit picornaviral uncoating after entry into host cells has been characterized crystallographically. All of these bind into the same hydrophobic pocket within the viral protein VP1 beta-barrel structure, although the orientation and position of each compound within the pocket was found to differ. The compounds cause the protein shell to be less flexible, thereby inhibiting disassembly. Although the antiviral potency of these compounds varies by 120-fold, they all induce the same conformational changes on the virion. The interactions of these compounds with the viral capsid are consistent with their observed antiviral activities against human rhinovirus 14 drug-resistant mutants and other rhinovirus serotypes. Crystallographic studies of one of these mutants confirm the partial sequencing data and support the finding that this is a single mutation that occurs within the binding pocket.