Short term GH replacement therapy has been shown to improve body composition and exercise capacity. It is not yet known whether GH replacement remains beneficial over the long term. We assessed the effects of long term GH replacement on body composition, bone mineral density, and cardiac function. Thirty-eight men with childhood-onset GH deficiency were studied for a period of 3-5 yr. Measurements included anthropometry, computed tomographic scanning of abdomen and upper leg, bone densitometry, echo cardiography, and bicycle ergometry. The initial GH dose of 1-3 IU/m2 x day (9-27 microg/kg) was gradually tapered to 1.30+/-0.38 IU/m2 x day (11 g/kg), aiming at physiological insulin-like growth factor I levels. During the study, leg muscle mass progressively increased by 28.7% (P<0.001). Subcutaneous and intraabdominal fat decreased by 30.9% and 46.0%, respectively, after 1 yr (both P<0.001), but demonstrated a partial regain thereafter. Bone mineral density at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter gradually increased by 9.6%, 11.1%, and 16.2%, respectively (all P<0.001). Left ventricular mass exceeded baseline values by 14.1% after 1 yr (P<0.001), but returned to pretreatment values thereafter. Stroke volume and cardiac output increased by 16.3% (P = 0.002) and 33.4% (P<0.001), respectively. Maximal work load increased from 189+/-30 to 232+/-41 watts (P<0.001). Thus, long term GH replacement is safe and beneficial. It improves cardiac performance without inducing left ventricular hypertrophy and progressively increases bone mineral density.
Introduction Despite widespread and liberal use of oxygen supplementation, guidelines about rational use of oxygen are scarce. Recent data demonstrates that current protocols lead to hyperoxemia in the majority of the patients and most health care professionals are not aware of the negative effects of hyperoxemia. Method To investigate the effects of hyperoxemia in acutely ill patients on clinically relevant outcomes, such as neurological and functional status as well as mortality, we performed a literature review using Medline (PubMed) and Embase. We used the following terms: hyperoxemia OR hyperoxemia OR [“oxygen inhalation therapy” AND (mortality OR death OR outcome OR survival)] OR [oxygen AND (mortality OR death OR outcome OR survival)]. Original studies about the clinical effects of hyperoxemia in adult patients suffering from acute or emergency illnesses were included. Results 37 articles were included, of which 31 could be divided into four large groups: cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and sepsis. Although a single study demonstrated a transient protective effect of hyperoxemia after TBI, other studies revealed higher mortality rates after cardiac arrest, stroke, and TBI treated with oxygen supplementation leading to hyperoxemia. Approximately half of the studies showed no association between hyperoxemia and clinically relevant outcomes. Conclusion Liberal oxygen therapy leads to hyperoxemia in a majority of patients and hyperoxemia may negatively affect survival after acute illness. As a clinical consequence, aiming for normoxemia may limit negative effects of hyperoxemia in patients with acute illness.
The steady-state pharmacokinetics of cefepime were evaluated in 10 middle-aged and elderly patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections who were receiving 1 g intravenously every 12 h. One preinfusion and 15 postinfusion serum samples and total urine output were collected over one dosing interval between days 3 and 8 of therapy. Cefepime concentrations in serum over time exhibited a multicompartmental profile. Peak and trough concentrations in serum determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method were 71.2 ± 17.2 (mean ± standard deviation) and 6.0 ± 4.9 mg/liter, respectively. The steady-state volume of distribution was 0.22 ± 0.05 liter/kg. Elimination half-lives ranged from 1.93 to 6.04 h (3.92 ± 1.28 h), and total body clearances ranged from 36.9 to 102 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (73.0 ± 19.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The disposition of cefepime at steady state in patients was comparable to previous observations in healthy elderly volunteers. The predictive performance of regression equations derived from single-dose studies in volunteers relating creatinine clearance with total body and renal clearances of cefepime exhibited slight biases (mean predictive errors, -9.7 and 2.1 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) and similar precisions. Predicted and observed total body clearances (63.3 ± 25.1 versus 73.0 ± 19.7 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) and renal clearances (51.3 ± 24.4 versus 49.3 ± 19.6 ml/min per 1.73 m2, respectively) were not significantly different. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime in infected patients appeared to be unaltered by illness, and the steady-state disposition of cefepime was predictable from data derived from single-dose studies in volunteers.Cefepime is an investigational cephalosporin which, in comparison with currently marketed extended-spectrum agents, demonstrates increased coverage against gram-positive organisms while retaining a broad spectrum of activity against gram-negative organisms. Against members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, MICs for 90% of strains are generally <0.5 mg/liter, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa they are <8 mg/liter, and against Staphylococcus aureus they are <4 mg/liter (6,15,16). In healthy adult volunteers, cefepime exhibited a multicompartmental serum concentration-versus-time profile with an elimination half-life (t12,3) of approximately 2 h (14). The pharmacokinetic disposition of cefepime has also been characterized in healthy elderly volunteers after single-dose intravenous administration. Elderly subjects had higher concentrations of drug in serum throughout the sampling period, with a prolonged t1/2,3 and decreased systemic clearance primarily because of agerelated decreases in renal function (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.