Aims To assess whether patients on the elderly care wards at NUH (Nottingham University Hospitals) were appropriately given IV (intravenous) iron for Iron deficiency anaemia (IDA). To improve our practice in the investigation and follow up of patients with IDA. Method Data was obtained of patients who had IV iron dispensed from June—September 2019. This totalled 146 patients. Digital medical records and Notis results. Server were reviewed and a spread sheet database compiled with patient demographics, presentation, blood results. Co-morbidities, medication, investigations and follow up. Results The average age of the patients receiving IV iron on the elderly care wards was 86 (range 74–106). 89 were female and 57 male. The top presenting complaints were; fall (38%), abdominal symptoms of pain, diarrhoea or vomiting (15%), SOB (12%). 30% of patient were on anti-coagulation and 27% were on an anti-platelet with 2% of patient on both. Mean female Hb was 89 (41–129) and male Hb was 91 (49–117). The data showed that 8 out of 81 female patients were given IV iron despite not being anaemic. In 7.5% of cases ferritin, TSAT, iron and transferrin had not been checked. Ferritin was not checked 16%. 82% of patients had no documentation with regards to the rationale for choosing not to proceed with invasive investigation. Conclusion Improvement is needed in the way we manage patients with IDA. This audit highlighted the need for continued review of medications—particularly anti-platelets and anti-coagulants. If there is a weak indication consider the risks and benefits. It is important we discuss and document the consideration or unsuitability of invasive investigations and follow up. A proforma is being written to guide clinicians with regards to the appropriate prescribing of IV iron and to guide investigation and follow up.