Objectives: In septic patients, reliable non-invasive predictors of fluid responsiveness are needed. We hypothesised that the respiratory changes in the amplitude of the plethysmographic pulse wave (∆P PLET ) would allow the prediction of changes in cardiac index following volume administration in mechanically ventilated septic patients. Design: Prospective clinical investigation. Setting: An 11-bed hospital medical intensive care unit. Patients: Twenty-three deeply sedated septic patients mechanically ventilated with tidal volume ≥ 8 ml/kg and equipped with an arterial catheter and a pulse oximetry plethysmographic sensor. Interventions: Respiratory changes in pulse pressure (∆PP), ∆P PLET and cardiac index (transthoracic Doppler echocardiography) were determined before and after volume infusion of colloids (8 ml/kg). Measurements and main results: Twenty-eight volume challenges were performed in 23 patients. Before volume expansion, ∆PP correlated with ∆P PLET (r 2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). Changes in cardiac index after volume expansion significantly (p < 0.001) correlated with baseline ∆PP (r 2 = 0.76) and ∆P PLET (r 2 = 0.50). The patients were defined as responders to fluid challenge when cardiac index increased by at least 15% after the fluid challenge. Such an event occurred 18 times. Before volume challenge, a ∆PP value of 12% and a ∆P PLET value of 14% allowed discrimination between responders and non-responders with sensitivity of 100% and 94% respectively and specificity of 70% and 80% respectively. Comparison of areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves showed that ∆PP and ∆P PLET predicted similarly fluid responsiveness. Conclusion: The present study found ∆P PLET to be as accurate as ∆PP for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated septic patients.
The present study found DeltaPEPKT and DeltaPEPPLET to be as accurate as DeltaPP in the prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated septic patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.