This double-blind, randomized, multi-center study compared the efficacy and clinical tolerance of a combined formulation containing 2 mg estradiol (E2) and 0.5 mg trimegestone (TMG) with a standard hormone replacement therapy containing estradiol valerate (E2V) and norgestrel (NG) in the treatment of climacteric symptoms. The study was conducted over 13 cycles, each of 28 days, and involved 634 subjects, of whom 481 completed the study. The primary efficacy variable was the percentage of subjects who showed at least a 50% reduction from baseline in the mean daily number of hot flushes in cycle 3. This was observed in 98.5% of the subjects in the E2 + TMG group and 93.3% of the subjects in the E2V + NG group (95% confidence interval of the difference, -8.6, -1.9). Significant differences in favor of the E2 + TMG combination were observed in the reduction in the mean daily number and severity of hot flushes, and in the percentage of subjects who had hot flushes at baseline but no hot flushes during treatment. There were no significant differences between the treatments in the Kupperman index and in urogenital signs or symptoms. Treatment with the E2 + TMG combination was well tolerated and the incidences of adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups. Breast pain was the main adverse event, possibly related to treatment that resulted in discontinuation. The mean number of bleeding days per cycle was significantly lower with the E2 + TMG combination than with the E2V + NG combination. The incidences of endometrial hyperplasia were low and comparable in both treatment groups. It was concluded that the E2 + TMG combination was either equivalent or superior to the E2V + NG combination in the treatment of hot flushes and other climacteric symptoms, and that its bleeding profile was favorable.

No abstract

This double-blind, randomized, multi-center study compared the metabolic tolerance of a combined formulation containing estradiol (E2) and trimegestone (TMG) with a standard hormone replacement therapy (HRT) containing estradiol valerate (EV) and norgestrel (NG). Blood lipids, glucose and fibrinogen concentrations were measured in the study which was conducted over 13 cycles, each of 28 days, and included 634 subjects in two randomized groups. A total of 481 subjects completed the study. The circulating concentrations of high density lipoprotein (HDL), HDL2, HDL3 cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 were increased in the E2 + TMG group and reduced in the EV + NG group. Total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and lipoprotein(a) concentrations were decreased in both treatment groups; however, the reduction in LDL cholesterol was greater in the E2 + TMG group. Similar lipid findings were found in a subgroup that excluded subjects who had less than 3 months washout from a previous HRT, who provided a blood sample outside the day 17-28 window, or who were taking beta-blockers or thiazide diuretics. Blood glucose concentrations were reduced slightly in both treatment groups. A significant reduction in fibrinogen was also seen in both groups over the course of the study. The changes in lipid profile, especially HDL cholesterol, were more beneficial in the E2 + TMG group in comparison with the EV + NG group. This reflects the lack of androgenic action of trimegestone in comparison with norgestrel, which exhibits an androgenic effect and prevents the estrogen-induced increase in HDL cholesterol. The results of the study suggest that the use of trimegestone in combination with E2 may be preferable to norgestrel because of the more favorable lipid profile.

No abstract

No abstract