Seventy five accessions belonging to 14 species of the genus Cicer were analysed with PCR-based molecular markers to determine their phylogenetic relationships. Eight of the species were annuals and included the Section Monocicer which contains cultivated chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). The remaining six species were perennials (five from Section Polycicer and one from Section Acanthocicer). More than one accession per species was analysed in most of the wild species; within C. arietinum, 26 accessions including Kabuli and Desi types, were studied. RAPD analyses using 12 primers gave 234 polymorphic fragments. Variability within species was detected. A dendrogram based on the Jaccard similarity index showed that the distribution pattern of variability between species was related to both growth habit and geographical origin. An accession of Cicer reticulatum was closer to accessions of Cicer echinospermum than to the four remaining of C. reticulatum, suggesting the possibility of gene flow between species. Cluster analysis for cultivated chickpea differentiated Kabuli and Desi types but we did not detect a clear relationship between groups and the geographical origin of the accessions.
The unsuccessful penetration of O. crenata seedlings into legume roots cannot be attributed to cell death in the host. It seems to be associated with lignification of host endodermis and pericycle cells at the penetration site. The accumulation of secretions at the infection site, may lead to the activation of xylem occlusion, another defence mechanism, which may cause further necrosis of established tubercles.
Two quantitative trait loci (QTLs), (QTL(AR1) and QTL(AR2)) associated with resistance to ascochyta blight, caused by Ascochyta rabiei, have been identified in a recombinant inbred line population derived from a cross of kabulixdesi chickpea. The population was evaluated in two cropping seasons under field conditions and the QTLs were found to be located in two different linkage groups (LG4a and LG4b). LG4b was saturated with RAPD markers and four of them associated with resistance were sequenced to give sequence characterized amplified regions (SCARs) that segregated with QTL(AR2). This QTL explained 21% of the total phenotypic variation. However, QTL(AR1), located in LG4a, explained around 34% of the total phenotypic variation in reaction to ascochyta blight when scored in the second cropping season. This LG4a region only includes a few markers, the flower colour locus (B/b), STMS GAA47, a RAPD marker and an inter-simple-sequence-repeat and corresponds with a previously reported QTL. From the four SCARs tagging QTL(AR2), SCAR (SCY17(590)) was co-dominant, and the other three were dominant. All SCARs segregated in a 1:1 (presence:absence) ratio and the scoring co-segregated with their respective RAPD markers. QTL(AR2) on LG4b was mapped in a highly saturated genomic region covering a genetic distance of 0.8 cM with a cluster of nine markers (three SCARs, two sequence-tagged microsatellite sites (STMS) and four RAPDs). Two of the four SCARs showed significant alignment with genes or proteins related to disease resistance in other species and one of them (SCK13(603)) was sited in the highly saturated region linked to QTL(AR2). STMS TA72 and TA146 located in LG4b were described in previous maps where QTL for blight resistance were also localized in both inter and intraspecific crosses. These findings may improve the precision of molecular breeding for QTL(AR2) as they will allow the choice of as much polymorphism as possible in any population and could be the starting point for finding a candidate resistant gene for ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea.
BackgroundAscochyta blight, caused by Mycosphaerella pinodes is one of the most important pea pathogens. However, little is known about the genes and mechanisms of resistance acting against M. pinodes in pea. Resistance identified so far to this pathogen is incomplete, polygenic and scarce in pea, being most common in Pisum relatives. The identification of the genes underlying resistance would increase our knowledge about M. pinodes-pea interaction and would facilitate the introgression of resistance into pea varieties. In the present study differentially expressed genes in the resistant P. sativum ssp. syriacum accession P665 comparing to the susceptible pea cv. Messire after inoculation with M. pinodes have been identified using a M. truncatula microarray.ResultsOf the 16,470 sequences analysed, 346 were differentially regulated. Differentially regulated genes belonged to almost all functional categories and included genes involved in defense such as genes involved in cell wall reinforcement, phenylpropanoid and phytoalexins metabolism, pathogenesis- related (PR) proteins and detoxification processes. Genes associated with jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene signal transduction pathways were induced suggesting that the response to M. pinodes in pea is regulated via JA and ET pathways. Expression levels of ten differentially regulated genes were validated in inoculated and control plants using qRT-PCR showing that the P665 accession shows constitutively an increased expression of the defense related genes as peroxidases, disease resistance response protein 39 (DRR230-b), glutathione S-transferase (GST) and 6a-hydroxymaackiain methyltransferase.ConclusionsThrough this study a global view of genes expressed during resistance to M. pinodes has been obtained, giving relevant information about the mechanisms and pathways conferring resistance to this important disease. In addition, the M. truncatula microarray represents an efficient tool to identify candidate genes controlling resistance to M. pinodes in pea.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.