Diverse potentiators of contraction have basically identical, activestate mechanical effects, but act by different membrane-mediated electromechanical coupling mechanisms. The falling phase of the action potential is greatly prolonged by Zn(2+) (0.1 mM) and UO(2)(2+) (0.5 to 1 microM), neither of which affects the mechanical threshold. Caffeine (1 mM), like the lyotropic anions, acts conversely. Thus changes in the duration and mechanical threshold of the action potential determine independent electromechanical coupling processes which can act individually, or conjointly in the action of other potentiators, in determining the duration of the active state and thus the potentiation of twitch tension.

No abstract

1. The activity of cutaneous mechanoreceptors was recorded extracellularly in the mandibular division of the Gasserian ganglion of hemidecerebrate anesthetized rabbits. Fifty-four hair follicle afferents and 80 skin mechanoreceptor afferents were functionally identified. Their receptive-field characteristics were described and their activity patterns were recorded while the jaw was displaced by hand in the vertical, horizontal, and anterior-posterior directions, and during masticatory movements. 2. All hair follicle afferents were classified as rapidly adapting, whereas skin afferents could be divided into two categories: rapidly adapting and slowly adapting. Rapidly and slowly adapting receptors were found in all regions of the mandibular skin. Only one hair follicle afferent and four skin afferents fired spontaneously with the jaw at rest. 3. Fifty-eight percent (29/50) of the hair follicle afferents were activated by imposed displacement of the jaw and all of these tested also discharged during chewing. They were sensitive to movement in all three axes and their firing frequency was linearly related to the velocity, regardless of direction. 4. Only 10% (8/80) of the skin afferents were activated by imposed displacement of the jaw if their receptive fields were not directly contacted. Firing frequency was not well related to either the amplitude or velocity of movement. During chewing, the discharge frequency was variable but, in general, firing was restricted to the jaw-closing phase. Most skin afferents that were active during jaw movement had receptive fields close to the corner of the mouth. 5. The results are discussed within the context of a possible involvement of cutaneous afferents in kinesthesia and in the control of jaw movements. Hair afferents could make specific contributions to the appreciation of movement because their discharge pattern was clearly related to one of its parameters. The lack of activity of most skin afferents, as well as the absence of a strong correlation between the firing frequency of those that were active and the movement parameters, suggest that they do not make specific contributions to the awareness of movement. 6. Hair and skin afferents may also make different contributions to the control of ongoing movements. It is suggested that skin afferent activity during jaw closure may elicit a reflex reduction in the velocity or duration of this phase. Some evidence from other studies suggests that hair afferent activity may indirectly influence movement via effects on elevator fusimotor neurons.

No abstract

No abstract