Fluid, particle-in-cell and hybrid models are the numerical simulation techniques commonly used for simulating low-temperature plasma discharges. Despite the complexity of plasma systems and the challenges in describing and modelling them, well-organized simulation methods can provide physical information often difficult to obtain from experiments. Simulation results can also be used to identify research guidelines, find optimum operating conditions or propose novel designs for performance improvements. In this paper, we present an overview of the principles, strengths and limitations of the three simulation models, including a brief history and the recent status of their development. The three modelling techniques are benchmarked by comparing simulation results in different plasma systems (plasma display panels, capacitively coupled plasmas and inductively coupled plasmas) with experimentally measured data. In addition, different aspects of the electron and ion kinetics in these systems are discussed based upon simulation results.
Atmospheric-pressure plasmas (APPs) have attracted great interest and have been widely applied in biomedical applications, as due to their non-thermal and reactive properties, they interact with living tissues, cells and bacteria. Various types of plasma sources generated at atmospheric pressure have been developed to achieve better performance in specific applications. This article presents an overview of the general characteristics of APPs and a brief summary of their biomedical applications, and reviews a wide range of these sources developed for biomedical applications. The plasma sources are classified according to their power sources and cover a wide frequency spectrum from dc to microwaves. The configurations and characteristics of plasma sources are outlined and their biomedical applications are presented.
Particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo simulations are used to study the possibility of ion energy distribution function (IEDF) control on the powered electrode in asymmetric single and double frequency capacitive discharges in argon. The possibility of IEDF control is demonstrated. It is shown that the IEDF shape and spread on the cathode can be controlled by the driven voltage in a single frequency discharge and by the low frequency voltage in a dual frequency capacitive discharge. It is shown that the IEDF shape on the powered electrode can be controlled by the driven frequency in single frequency capacitively coupled plasmas. It is shown that the density of plasma decreases, and the sheath width, the plasma potential and the self-bias voltage increase, with growth of the low frequency voltage in the dual frequency capacitive discharge.
One-dimensional particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision (PIC-MCC) simulations of low-pressure (10 mTorr) argon plasmas sustained by a triple-frequency (1, 30 and 120 MHz) source in symmetrical current-driven and voltage-driven capacitively coupled plasma reactors are carried out. We concluded that the effective current, the effective voltage and the effective frequency are helpful in explaining the physics of triple-frequency capacitively coupled plasma sources (CCPs) alike single-frequency CCPs. The rf discharge parameters such as the ion energy distribution function (IEDF), the sheath length, the plasma potential and the powers dissipated by electrons and ions can be expressed as the effective frequency and the effective current density (or effective voltage). The analytical model of the IEDF for triple-frequency CCPs in the high-frequency regime is developed. The analytical calculations of the IEDF in the high-frequency regime through the effective frequency visualized in this paper are compared with the simulation results of the IEDF calculated from the 1D PIC-MCC model. The ion energy width and the average ion energy of the IEDF are controlled by the effective frequency, which is expressed as a function of the current density (or voltage) and frequency ratios of the triple-frequency source. The evolution of the effective frequency with the current density or voltage ratio of three frequency sources is different depending on the mode of operating source, which is either voltage or current. The effective frequency in voltage-driven CCPs is 2-10 times higher than that of current-driven CCPs at the same ratio of current density and voltage. As a result, the current-driven CCPs is more desirable than the voltage-driven CCPs from the aspect of independent control of ion flux and ion bombardment energy because the ion energy width increases with decreasing effective frequency.
Microdischarges at atmospheric pressure were studied by two computational methods. The first method is a typical one-dimensional fluid model in which the electron velocity distribution function is assumed to be Maxwellian and the energy equation is solved to determine the spatial profile of the electron temperature. The second method is a particle-in-cell (PIC) model with Monte-Carlo collisions (MCC). We compared the time-averaged density, electric field and power consumption profiles of helium microdischarges driven at 13.56 MHz and 2.45 GHz obtained with the two models. The agreement between the two models depends on the driving frequency. The kinetic information obtained from the PIC-MCC model indicates that the improved agreement at higher frequency is due to the evolution of the electron energy distribution function from a three-temperature distribution at 13.56 MHz to a close-to-Maxwellian distribution at 2.45 GHz.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.