The placement of a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device can be a technically challenging transcatheter‐based procedure. Key challenges include accurate pre‐procedural device sizing and proper device positioning at the LAA ostium to ensure sufficient device anchoring and avoid peri‐device leaks. To address these challenges, 3D printing (3DP) of LAA models has recently emerged in the literature, first being described in 2015. We present a review of the benefits and drawbacks of employing this technology for LAAO procedures. Pre‐procedurally the use of 3DP can consistently and accurately determine LAAO device size over standard of care approaches. Intra‐procedurally 3DP's impact entailed a statistically significant decrease in the number of devices used per procedure, as well as in the fluoroscopic time and dose. Post‐procedurally, there is some evidence that 3DP could reduce the rate of peri‐device leaks, with limited data on its effect on complication rates. Based on existing evidence, we recommend the focused application of 3DP to cases of complex LAA anatomy and for the training of proceduralists. Lastly, we address the emergence of next generation LAAO devices and AR/VR systems that could limit even this narrow window of clinical benefit afforded by 3DP.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract