Sweat rate may affect sweat lactate concentration. The current study examined potential gender differences in sweat lactate concentrations because of varying sweat rates. Males (n = 6) and females (n = 6) of similar age, percentage body fat, and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) completed constant load (CON) cycling (30 min--approximately 40% VO2max) and interval cycling (INT) (15 1-min intervals each separated by 1 min of rest) trials at 32 (1) degrees C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT). Trials were preceded by 15 min of warm-up (0.5 kp, 60 rpms) and followed by 15 min of rest. Blood and sweat samples were collected at 15, 25, 35, 45, and 60 min during each trial. Total body water loss was used to calculate sweat rate. Blood lactate concentrations (CON approximately equal to 2 mmol.l-1, INT approximately equal to 6 mmol.l-1) and sweat lactate concentrations (CON and INT approximately equal to 12 mmol.l-1) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) at any time between genders for CON or INT. Overall sweat rates (ml.h-1) were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between trials but were significantly greater (P < or = 0.05) for males than for females for CON [779.7 (292.6) versus 450.3 (84.6) ml.h-1] and INT [798.0 (268.3) versus 503.0 (41.4) ml.h-1]. However, correcting for surface area diminished the difference [CON: 390.7 (134.4) versus 277.7 (44.4) ml.h-1, INT: 401.5 (124.1) versus 310.6 (23.4) ml.h-1 (P < or = 0.07)]. Estimated total lactate secretion was significantly greater (P < or = 0.05) in males for CON and INT. Results suggest that sweat rate differences do not affect sweat lactate concentrations between genders.

Personal heat strain monitoring provides the best means for maximizing worker safety and productivity in hot jobs. The present study compared methods for reducing the environmental effect on aural canal temperature in an attempt to reduce the predictive error of a personal heat stress monitor (QST) and a simple ear thermistor (EAR). Subjects underwent three exposures in impermeable protective clothing (PC) in an environment of 30.1 degrees C wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) wearing either ear plugs (PLG), ear moulds (MLD) or ear moulds and earmuffs (MFS). Mean work time across all trials was 63.1 +/- 7.9 min, with a mean rectal temperature at 60 min of 38.5 +/- 0.1 degrees C and a sweat production rate of 29.7 +/- 8.6 g/min. Rectal temperature was used as the criterion measure of core temperature. Although group mean predictions were satisfactory, large SD of mean differences (+/- 0.36) meant that predictive ability of QST for individuals was greatly impaired. A simple well-insulated ear thermistor showed slightly better accuracy (+/- 0.28) as a predictor of rectal temperature across time, particularly at peak temperatures. Incorporating the predictive error of aural temperature still extended the duration of safe work times relative to ACGIH guidelines. Further investigation is still necessary to ensure that predictions based on aural temperature are accurate and safe for the worker population across varying conditions.

No abstract

No abstract