No abstract

We investigated the prognostic relevance of IKZF1 deletions in 118 adult Ph-positive ALL patients who had minimal residual disease (MRD) data under a uniform treatment of allo-SCT following first-line imatinib-based chemotherapy. IKZF1 deletions were identified in 93 patients (78.8%). IKZF1-deleted patients had a lower proportion of early-stable molecular responders compared with wild-type patients (28.0 vs 56.0%, P = 0.028). After a median follow-up of 72 months, IKZF1-deleted patients had a trend for higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (38.0 vs 13.3%, P = 0.052), particularly in a subgroup of early-stable molecular responders (n = 40; 21.4 vs 0%, P = 0.088), but comparable disease-free survival to wild-type patients. Patients with biallelic-null deletions showed higher CIR (74.6 vs 13.3%, P = 0.003) and lower disease-free survival (20.0 vs 67.5%, P = 0.022) than wild-type patients. In multivariate analysis, MRD kinetics were closely related to outcomes, while neither IKZF1 deletions nor their functional subtypes retained an independent statistical power. Within the limitation of sample size, however, considering both the negative impact of IKZF1 deletions on MRD kinetics and a trend for relationship between IKZF1 deletions and relapse in early-stable molecular responders, IKZF1 deletions may have a potentially additive effect on unfavorable prognosis in a specific MRD-based subgroup of adult Ph-positive ALL transplants.

BACKGROUND To evaluate the validity of intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring according to two different warning criteria for 6 months after intramedullary spinal ependymoma (IMSE) surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS To evaluate the validity of intraoperative somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) and motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring according to two different warning criteria for 6 months after intramedullary spinal ependymoma (IMSE) surgery. RESULTS The success rates of SSEP and MEP monitoring were 84.9% and 83.7%, respectively. There was one indeterminate case in SSEP and six in MEP. All-or-none criterion in SSEP and MEP monitoring showed higher specificity, PPV, and DOR than 50% decline criterion during 6 months. During the follow up, 37 of 38 extremities (97.4%) and 21 of 29 extremities (72.4%) were observed the improvement of sensory and motor deficit, respectively. Seven indeterminate cases also showed good clinical outcomes. However, most patients remained some degree of neurologic deficit. CONCLUSION Many false positive and false negative results of SSEP and MEP monitoring occurred immediately postoperative period. All-or-none criterion was more beneficial for IMSE surgery than 50% decline criterion. This trend was maintained until 6 months after surgery.