We investigated the prognostic relevance of IKZF1 deletions in 118 adult Ph-positive ALL patients who had minimal residual disease (MRD) data under a uniform treatment of allo-SCT following first-line imatinib-based chemotherapy. IKZF1 deletions were identified in 93 patients (78.8%). IKZF1-deleted patients had a lower proportion of early-stable molecular responders compared with wild-type patients (28.0 vs 56.0%, P = 0.028). After a median follow-up of 72 months, IKZF1-deleted patients had a trend for higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (38.0 vs 13.3%, P = 0.052), particularly in a subgroup of early-stable molecular responders (n = 40; 21.4 vs 0%, P = 0.088), but comparable disease-free survival to wild-type patients. Patients with biallelic-null deletions showed higher CIR (74.6 vs 13.3%, P = 0.003) and lower disease-free survival (20.0 vs 67.5%, P = 0.022) than wild-type patients. In multivariate analysis, MRD kinetics were closely related to outcomes, while neither IKZF1 deletions nor their functional subtypes retained an independent statistical power. Within the limitation of sample size, however, considering both the negative impact of IKZF1 deletions on MRD kinetics and a trend for relationship between IKZF1 deletions and relapse in early-stable molecular responders, IKZF1 deletions may have a potentially additive effect on unfavorable prognosis in a specific MRD-based subgroup of adult Ph-positive ALL transplants.

In this study, we verified the accuracy of CCC algorithm in the TPS. Calculated results by our implemented algorithm was well satisfied with measured dose at small field size (〈20 7 times; 20 cm ). Our next study will perform to compensate theses inconsistencies.

Purpose: The dose‐related effects of patient setup errors on biophysical indices were evaluated for conventional wedge (CW) and field‐in‐field (FIF) whole breast irradiation techniques. Methods: The treatment plans for 10 patients receiving whole left breast irradiation were retrospectively selected. Radiobiological and physical effects caused by dose variations were evaluated by shifting the isocenters and gantry angles of the treatment plans. Dose‐volume histograms of the planning target volume (PTV), heart, and lungs were generated, and conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were determined. Results: For “isocenter shift plan” with posterior direction, the D95 of the PTV decreased by approximately 15% and the TCP of the PTV decreased by approximately 50% for the FIF technique and by 40% for the CW; however, the NTCPs of the lungs and heart increased by about 13% and 1%, respectively, for both techniques. Increasing the gantry angle decreased the TCPs of the PTV by 24.4% (CW) and by 34% (FIF). The NTCPs for the two techniques differed by only 3%. In case of CW, the CIs and HIs were much higher than that of the FIF in all cases. It had a significant difference between two techniques (p<0.01). According to our results, however, the FIF had more sensitive response by set up errors rather than CW in bio‐physical aspects. Conclusions: The radiobiological‐based analysis can detect significant dosimetric errors then, can provide a practical patient quality assurance method to guide the radiobiological and physical effects.