The concept of adaptive licensing (AL) has met with considerable interest. Yet some remain skeptical about its feasibility. Others argue that the focus and name of AL should be broadened. Against this background of ongoing debate, we examine the environmental changes that will likely make adaptive pathways the preferred approach in the future. The key drivers include: growing patient demand for timely access to promising therapies, emerging science leading to fragmentation of treatment populations, rising payer influence on product accessibility, and pressure on pharma/investors to ensure sustainability of drug development. We also discuss a number of environmental changes that will enable an adaptive paradigm. A life‐span approach to bringing innovation to patients is expected to help address the perceived access vs. evidence trade‐off, help de‐risk drug development, and lead to better outcomes for patients.

The intrathecal delivery of r-metHuBDNF in doses of up to 150 microg/day was well tolerated and appears feasible. The reversible CNS effects with higher dose indicate that BDNF can be delivered cranially against CSF flow. The small number of patients and the design of the study did not permit conclusions to be drawn about the efficacy of the treatment.

SummaryControl of oral anticoagulant therapy in outpatients is often unsatisfactory. The contribution of poor compliance with prescribed warfarin to unstable anticoagulant control was investigated prospectively using low-dose phenobarbitone as an indicator of compliance in 30 out-patients, 15 with stable and 15 with unstable control. Following entry to the study, there was no significant change in anticoagulation (p = 0.36) in the group with stable control. In the group who previously had unstable control, there was a significant change in INR (p = 0.0045) and anticoagulant control greatly improved. It appears that the considerable fluctuation in INR seen in many of the latter patients before the study was due to poor compliance and that entering them into the study modified their behaviour. Two patients in this group who continued to have unstable anticoagulant control were shown to be poorly compliant using the phenobarbitone indicator. The results suggest that, in outpatients, poor compliance is the major cause of unstable anticoagulation with warfarin.

The development of anticonvulsant tolerance during 10 days treatment with either clobazam or its principal metabolite, N‐desmethylclobazam (NDMC), was compared in mice using an i.v. infusion of pentylenetetrazole as the convulsive stimulus. Subsequently the anticonvulsant activity of NDMC was assessed in patients with refractory epilepsy. In mice, a highly significant tolerance (P less than 0.001) developed to clobazam (10 mg kg‐1 twice daily). During the same period, there was no significant change (P greater than 0.05) in the protection afforded by NDMC (40 or 80 mg kg‐1 twice daily) although some reduction in anticonvulsant activity was apparent. NDMC (30 mg once daily) was given to nine patients with frequent complex partial and/or grand mal seizures who had become tolerant to the anticonvulsant effect of clobazam. Seven of the patients had been free from benzodiazepine therapy for at least 2 weeks, while the other two patients were switched directly from clobazam. Eight of the nine patients showed a favourable response to NDMC. In the seven who had been given a holiday from clobazam the response to NDMC was similar to the initial response to clobazam and was achieved at plasma NDMC concentrations in the same range as those seen during clobazam administration (1000‐3000 ng ml‐1). It is concluded that NDMC is active as an anticonvulsant in man and there is evidence from the animal studies to suggest that it may be preferable to clobazam.

No abstract