Measuring antibodies to Bordetella pertussis antigens is mostly done by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). We compared the performance of ELISA kits that were commercially available in Germany. Eleven measured IgG antibodies, and nine measured IgA antibodies. An in-house ELISA with purified antigens served as a reference method. Samples included two WHO reference preparations, the former Food and Drug Administration (FDA)/Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) reference preparations, serum samples from patients with clinically suspected pertussis, and serum samples from patients having received a combined tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) vaccination. Kits using pertussis toxin (PT) as an antigen showed linearity compared to the WHO Reference preparation (r 2 between 0.82 and 0.99), and these kits could quantify antibodies according to the reference preparation. ELISA kits using mixed antigens showed no linear correlation to the reference preparations. Patient results were compared to results of in-house ELISAs using a dual cutoff of either >100 IU/ml anti-PT IgG or >40 IU/ml anti-PT IgG together with >12 IU/ml anti-PT IgA. The sensitivities of kits measuring IgG antibodies ranged between 0.84 and 1.00. The specificities of kits using PT as an antigen were between 0.81 and 0.93. The specificities of kits using mixed antigens were between 0.51 and 0.59 and were thus not acceptable. The sensitivities of kits measuring IgA antibodies ranged between 0.53 and 0.73, and the specificities were between 0.67 and 0.94, indicating that IgA antibodies may be of limited diagnostic value. Our data suggest that ELISAs should use purified PT as an antigen and be standardized to the 1st International Reference preparation.
Real-time PCR assays based on the LightCycler technology were developed for individual (simplex PCR) and simultaneous (duplex PCR) detection and discrimination of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis in clinical samples. The assays were evaluated with 113 specimens from patients with and without symptoms of pertussis. Results were compared to those from conventional culture and TaqMan real-time PCR. The analytical sensitivity ranged from 0.1 to 10 CFU for B. pertussis and B. parapertussis, and intra- and interassay variations were less than 7%. Results were available within 2 h. With the simplex format, 21 of 100 samples from patients with clinical symptoms of pertussis were positive for B. pertussis and/or B. parapertussis. With the duplex format, 18 of 100 samples were positive. LightCycler PCR increased the diagnostic sensitivity over that of culture by 2.0-fold (duplex PCR) (P = 0.08) to 2.3-fold (simplex PCR) (P = 0.02). Our data suggest that duplex PCR in this format showed good analytical sensitivity but lost some sensitivity on clinical samples compared with the simplex format.
Bordetella pertussis infection is mostly diagnosed by serological tests, such as by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) or by immunoblots. We compared immunoblots from five different manufacturers. Immunoblots from Euroimmun, Mikrogen, Trinity Biotech, Viramed and Virotech were used. All kits except the kit from Trinity Biotech measured IgG and IgA antibodies separately. The kits were used according to the kit inserts. Various reference preparations from the World Health Organization (WHO), the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research/Food and Drug Administration (CBER/FDA) were analysed. Patient sera with high antibody titres in ELISA, sera from patients with compatible clinical symptoms and sera from vaccinees were compared. An algorithm for interpreting quantitative values for IgG and IgA anti-pertussis toxin (PT) from in-house ELISAs was used as a reference. The sensitivity and specificity of the assays was variable when comparing the qualitative results of immunoblots with expected values of reference preparations and ELISA interpretation of patient sera. The interpretation of semi-quantitative reading of the immunoblots did not compare well to the ELISA results. Adenylate cyclase toxin as an additional antigen in two immunoblots did not effectively distinguish between infection and vaccination. Due to the lack of quantification of antibody concentrations, IgG and IgA immunoblots are of limited value in the serological diagnosis of pertussis.
Bordetella pertussis is increasingly detected by real-time PCR, but most kits for extracting Bordetella-DNA from respiratory samples are not validated for this material. Respiratory clinical materials were spiked with Bordetella pertussis cells. Four ion-exchange chromatography methods from one manufacturer were used for DNA preparation. Two real-time PCRs detecting the IS481 of Bordetella pertussis and based either on a hybridisation probes format (LightCycler) or on a TaqMan format were used. All kits effectively prepared DNA for Bordetella pertussis real-time PCR. The procedures were linear over a broad range, and the lower level of sensitivity was similar. Sensitivities measured as CT values were different. Inter-assay CVs were between 6.8% and 17.3%. Two kits did not effectively remove inhibitory substances from the respiratory samples. Commercial kits are useful for preparing Bordetella pertussis DNA from respiratory samples, but even kits from one manufacturer show significant differences in effectiveness and removal of inhibitory substances.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.