The effect of a multiple-dose regimen of oral ciprofloxacin (750 mg every 12 h for 11 doses) on the clearance and steady-state concentrations of theophylline in trough (predose) serum was evaluated in nine healthy male subjects, each serving as his own control. Theophylline was taken as a sustained release tablet per os in a dose of 200 mg every 12 h for 19 doses. Theophylline concentrations in serum were measured immediately before each theophylline dose. Ciprofloxacin was administered on study day 4 through the first dose of study day 8. Theophylline concentrations in serum were also measured on study days 3, 6, 8, and 10 at the following times after the first dose of each day: 0, 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 h. Steady-state theophylline concentrations in trough serum were significantly higher during ciprofloxacin treatment (day 8) than before (day 3) or after (day 10) ciprofloxacin administration (P < 0.01). Likewise, theophylline clearance was significantly slower (P < 0.01) during ciprofloxacin treatment (day 8) than before it (day 3) or after it (day 10). The magnitude of ciprofloxacin-induced changes was approximately 30%. These results suggest that a multidose regimen of ciprofloxacin significantly slows the clearance of theophylline and elevates theophylline concentrations in serum.
The pharmacokinetics of cefoperazone and sulbactam in combination were evaluated in six, elderly, seriously ill patients treated with the drug combination for intra-abdominal infections. After giving informed consent, three males and three females aged 63.5 to 77.5 (mean, 67.9) years and weighing 54.5 to 86.8 (mean, 67.6) kg were treated with cefoperazone (2.0 g) and sulbactam (1.0 g) infused intravenously every 12 h for at least 5 days. Cefoperazone and sulbactam pharmacokinetics were characterized on both days 1 and 5 of treatment. Eleven serial blood samples were obtained just prior to and following dose 1 on days 1 and 5 of treatment. Mean estimates of cefoperazone maximal concentration in plasma (C..), area under the curve of drug concentration in plasma versus time (AUC), half-life (t112), apparent volume of distribution by the area method (Yarne), apparent volume of distribution at steady state (V.), and total body clearance (CL) for day 1 (day 5) were 297.5 (237.5) ,ug/ml, 1,247 (1,063) ug. h/ml, 7.0 (4.9) h, 16.1 (13.4) liter, 13.1 (14.4) liter, and 28.9 (34.2) ml/min, respectively. Day 1 (day 5) mean values for sulbactam Cm.., AUC, t1/2, Varea, V., and CL were 110.3 (78.0),ug/ml, 228 (217) ug. h/ml, 3.4 (2.5) h, 26.1 (18.5) liter, 18.9 (15.4) liter, and 97 (94) ml/min, respectively. Both drugs evidenced slower elimination and greater pharmacokinetic variability in these patients compared with values previously reported for normal volunteers. As patients improved during the course of therapy, the only pharmacokinetic parameter significantly changed between days 1 and 5 was a shortened sulbactam t112. Our inability to find substantial evidence of pharmacokinetic normalization may have been related to sample size and study duration. Both drugs were present in potentially therapeutic concentrations for the entire 12-h dosing interval, but without undue accumulation from days 1 to 5.
The effect of ciprofloxacin treatment on theophylline clearance was evaluated with a theophylline multiple dose, multiple sample protocol and with a single dose, single sample protocol. The object was to determine whether a single dose, single sample protocol for estimating theophylline clearance could be used as a screening strategy for evaluating host factor influences on theophylline clearance. Ciprofloxacin (750 mg per os) was administered every 12 h for nine doses in the multidose study and every 12 h for seven doses in the single dose protocol. Subjects were sixteen healthy, non‐smoking young adult males. The oral clearance of theophylline at steady state, (CL/F)ss, decreased from a mean (+/‐ s.d.) value of 0.035 (+/‐ 0.008) 1 h‐1 kg‐1 to 0.024 (+/‐ 0.004) 1 h‐1 kg‐1 during ciprofloxacin treatment. Single sample estimates of theophylline clearance, CL/F, similarly decreased from 0.040 (+/‐ 0.014) 1 h‐1 kg‐1 to 0.018 (+/‐ 0.008) 1 h‐1 kg‐1. Mean theophylline clearances were significantly different when comparing control with ciprofloxacin treatment means (P less than 0.01), but were not different when comparing single sample vs multiple sample clearances for a given treatment (i.e. control or ciprofloxacin). It is concluded that a single dose, single sample strategy may be used in screening for host‐factor influences on theophylline clearance.
1. Single sample clearance estimates, Cl, were calculated for each of five drugs employed as probes of hepatic drug-metabolizing activity in rats. Probe drugs were theophylline, phenytoin, valproic acid, antipyrine, and S-warfarin. Cl values were calculated for each probe in animals pretreated with phenobarbital, isosafrole, beta-naphthoflavone, or clofibrate. Control animals were pretreated with vehicle only. 2. A clearance index (c.i., probe Cl after pretreatment divided by probe Cl control) was calculated for each probe and each pretreatment regimen, and data were consolidated to give different probe-based handprints of the pretreatment effects. 3. S-Warfarin was the least specific probe as its c.i. was greater than 1.0 subsequent to each pretreatment. Theophylline appeared to be the most selective probe since its c.i. deviated significantly from unity (3.56) only after beta-naphthoflavone pretreatment. Phenytoin exhibited c.i. values less than unity after each pretreatment indicating that it may not, when used as a single sample probe of hepatic drug-metabolizing activity, effectively discriminate between inductive or inhibitory effects of xenobiotics. 4. Multi-probe-based handprints of hepatic drug-metabolizing activity structured from simple single sample estimates of probe clearance have potential in the rapid screening of xenobiotic-induced alterations of drug-metabolizing enzyme activity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.