e11036 Background: It remains controversial if young age at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in breast cancer (BC) patients. Data regarding recurrence with long-term follow-up in premenopausal women are sparse. The aim of the study was to compare the outcome of young patients (<=39 years) with older premenopausal patients. Methods: We collected clinical and pathological data from an inception cohort of 241 premenopausal patients aged <=50 years at diagnosis with stage I-III BC between January 2000 and December 2005 in a single institution. Disease-free survival (DFS) event was defined as time from diagnosis to local or distant recurrence, contralateral invasive BC or death from any cause. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox model were used to analyze the covariable predictors for recurrence. Results: Median age was 43 years (range: 24-50) and median follow-up was 100 months (range: 72-137). Seventy seven patients (32%) were <=39 and 164 (68%) >39 years of age at diagnosis. Five and 10-year disease-free survival rate was 61 % and 48% respectively for the younger group and 77% and 74% for the older group (p<0.001). In the univariate analysis the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence in young patients was 2.16 (95%CI: 1.38-3.37) (p< 0.001) Adjusting for T stage (<=2 cm versus >2 cm), N (negative versus positive nodes), Grade (grade 1-2 versus grade 3) and Hormonal Receptor status (positive versus negative), age less than 40 remains and independent prognostic factor for recurrence with an adjusted HR of 2.42 (95%CI: 1.42-4.10) (p<0.001), and was the most important adverse independent predictor among the factors included in the model. Conclusions: BC patients younger than 40 years of age at diagnosis have worse prognosis than older premenopausal patients, and have an independent prognostic value for recurrence after adjusting for known prognostic factors.
Background: The aim of the study was to determine the cumulative incidence of BM, predictive factors of BM, and survival from diagnosis of BM in a cohort of breast cancer patients in a single institution.
Patients and Methods: We collected data from a cohort of 793 breast cancer patients between January 2000 and December 2005 in our institution. Variables recorded include age at diagnosis, hormonal receptor status (HRS), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status (HER2), histological grade, T stage and N stage. We analyzed the 5 and 10-year cumulative incidence of BM. Time to detection of BM and survival from BM were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression model was used to analyze the variables associated with time to BM
Results: With a median follow-up of 100 months, 49 patients went on to develop BM. The overall 5 and 10 year cumulative incidence of BM were 4.9% and 8.2% respectively. The table shows the 5 and 10 year cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR) of the predictive factors for the development of BM in the univariable analysis.
Including all significant variables in the model, HER2 positive and node positive patients had an increase risk of BM, HR 2.46 (95% CI: 1.22–4.95) and 2.51 (95% CI: 1.19–5.29) respectively. HRS positive patients had a decreased risk of developing BM, HR 0.44 (95% CI: 0.21–0.89).
Median survival from BM of HER2 positive and HER2 negative patients was 9 and 3 months respectively (p = 0.015), and 6 and 1 month for HRS positive and negative respectively (p = 0.02)
Conclusion: Predictive factors independently associated with a high risk of BM in our cohort are HER2 positivity and positive nodes. Patients with positive HRS have a decreased risk of BM. Survival time following BM is poor. HER2 positive and HRS positive patients have a better survival than HER2 negative and HRS negative patients.
Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-12-08.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.