Summary
Monoclonal anti‐CD25‐antibodies are successfully applied in organ transplantation to reduce the incidence of acute graft rejection. However, targeting the CD25 molecule might not only affect activated T‐cells but also regulatory T‐cells (Tregs) constitutively expressing the CD4+CD25+CD127lowFoxP3+ phenotype. In this study, we investigated the influence of the anti‐CD25‐antibody Basiliximab on the frequency of Tregs early after kidney transplantation comparing individuals receiving/not receiving induction therapy (n = 14 and n = 7). Following Basiliximab administration, a distinct loss of CD4+CD25high T‐cells was observed lasting for at least 6 weeks. This was not accompanied by a disappearance of the entire CD4+CD25+FoxP3+ Tregs but rather a decreased expression density of CD25 on the latter. In addition, a transient rise in CD4+CD25−FoxP3+ T‐cells was found which expressed the CD127low phenotype. Thus, a phenotypic shift of Tregs from the CD25+ to the CD25− compartment was suggested. This was supported by in vitro findings showing that the disappearance of CD4+CD25high cells in the presence of Basiliximab was due to down‐regulation of CD25 expression meanwhile the suppressive function of these cells was maintained. In conclusion, Basiliximab therapy directly affects CD4+CD25+CD127lowFoxP3+ Tregs but does not seem to be associated with functional consequences. Thus, it is unlikely that Basiliximab treatment negatively influences strategies involving Tregs to promote tolerance after organ transplantation.
Acute rejection (AR) is an important factor for the development of chronic allograft dysfunction following kidney Tx. Identification of patients who would benefit from closer clinical surveillance to allow individual tailoring of immunosuppression and hence reducing the rate of AR is highly desired. Aim of this study was to investigate the association of pre-transplant alloreactivity and frequency of regulatory T cells (T(regs) ) with AR following living-donor kidney Tx. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from 40 patients prior to Tx. T-cell alloreactivity against donor and third-party antigen was assessed by proliferative responses in mixed lymphocyte culture and enzyme linked immunospot technique. Pre-transplant frequency of CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(low) FoxP3(+) T(regs) was determined by flow cytometry. Experimental data were correlated with occurrence of AR. We found that patients with rejection-free (RF) post-Tx courses showed significantly lower pre-transplant alloreactivity to donor antigen compared to individuals with borderline findings (BL) or AR. For RF patients, the proliferative T-cell responses to third-party antigen were significantly higher than for stimulation with donor cells whereas lymphocytes of the AR group showed the inverse pattern. A significantly higher expression of FoxP3 within the CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(low) subset for RF and BL compared to the AR group was observed. In conclusion, pre-transplant anti-donor alloreactivity and FoxP3 expression within the CD4(+) CD25(+) CD127(low) subpopulation might prove useful to further define the patient's risk for AR.
Introduction: Complements play important roles in both rejection and ischemia-reperfusion injury after transplantation. C5 is one of pivotal complement proteins, which not only initiates the assembly of the membrane attack complex, C5b-9, but also mediates chemotaxis of various immune cells through interaction with its cognate receptor, C5a receptor (C5aR). We evaluated the influence of genetic variations in the C5 and its receptor C5aR of both recipients and donors on the allograft outcomes in the living donor kidney transplantation. Methods: Seven single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in C5 (
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.