The modern giant sperm whale Physeter macrocephalus, one of the largest known predators, preys upon cephalopods at great depths. Lacking a functional upper dentition, it relies on suction for catching its prey; in contrast, several smaller Miocene sperm whales (Physeteroidea) have been interpreted as raptorial (versus suction) feeders, analogous to the modern killer whale Orcinus orca. Whereas very large physeteroid teeth have been discovered in various Miocene localities, associated diagnostic cranial remains have not been found so far. Here we report the discovery of a new giant sperm whale from the Middle Miocene of Peru (approximately 12-13 million years ago), Leviathan melvillei, described on the basis of a skull with teeth and mandible. With a 3-m-long head, very large upper and lower teeth (maximum diameter and length of 12 cm and greater than 36 cm, respectively), robust jaws and a temporal fossa considerably larger than in Physeter, this stem physeteroid represents one of the largest raptorial predators and, to our knowledge, the biggest tetrapod bite ever found. The appearance of gigantic raptorial sperm whales in the fossil record coincides with a phase of diversification and size-range increase of the baleen-bearing mysticetes in the Miocene. We propose that Leviathan fed mostly on high-energy content medium-size baleen whales. As a top predator, together with the contemporaneous giant shark Carcharocles megalodon, it probably had a profound impact on the structuring of Miocene marine communities. The development of a vast supracranial basin in Leviathan, extending on the rostrum as in Physeter, might indicate the presence of an enlarged spermaceti organ in the former that is not associated with deep diving or obligatory suction feeding.

the genus Macrocnemus is a member of the Tanystropheidae, a clade of non-archosauriform archosauromorphs well known for their very characteristic, elongated cervical vertebrae. Articulated specimens are known from the Middle Triassic of Alpine Europe and China. Although multiple articulated specimens are known, description of the cranial morphology has proven challenging due to the crushed preservation of the specimens. Here we use synchrotron micro computed tomography to analyse the cranial morphology of a specimen of the type species Macrocnemus bassanii from the Besano Formation of Monte San Giorgio, Ticino, Switzerland. The skull is virtually complete and we identify and describe the braincase and palatal elements as well the atlas-axis complex for the first time. Moreover, we add to the knowledge of the morphology of the skull roof, rostrum and hemimandible, and reconstruct the cranium of M. bassanii in 3D using the rendered models of the elements. The circumorbital bones were found to be similar in morphology to those of the archosauromorphs Prolacerta broomi and Protorosaurus speneri. In addition, we confirm the palatine, vomer and pterygoid to be tooth-bearing palatal bones, but also observed heterodonty on the pterygoid and the palatine. The genus Macrocnemus was described in the early twentieth century by Baron von Nopcsa based on a fragmentary specimen from Monte San Giorgio 1,2. After subsequent expeditions to the Besano Formation, which crops out in the Monte San Giorgio area, resulted in the discovery of additional specimens, the taxon was more properly described 3. Unfortunately, the holotype, stored in Milan, has since been lost as it was destroyed during the Second World War 4. The phylogenetic affinities of Macrocnemus were initially unclear. Early researchers observed similarities in the shape of the cervical vertebrae with contemporaneous taxa and erected the taxon Protorosauria 5,6. Notable members of this formerly recognised 'superorder' were Tanystropheus, Protorosaurus, Macrocnemus and Prolacerta, and all these taxa have elongated cervical vertebrae. The elongation of the cervical vertebrae is expressed most extremely in the genus Tanystropheus, of which the neck is three times the length of its trunk 7. Researchers were unsure whether to place the clade closer to the Lepidosauria or to the Archosauromorpha (e.g. 7,8). Currently, the members of the Protorosauria are all considered non-archosauriform archosauromorphs (e.g. 9-11). However, the clade itself has been observed to be paraphyletic or even polyphyletic in recent phylogenetic analyses 9 and references therein. Nonetheless, the recent analyses noted above have all recovered a monophyletic Tanystropheidae at the base of Archosauromorpha that includes Macrocnemus as well as Tanystropheus, Amotosaurus, Langobardisaurus, and Tanytrachelos, with Jesairosaurus often recovered as sister taxon to the clade.

No abstract