Most of the bacteria in drinking water distribution systems are associated with biofilms. In biofilms, their nutrient supply is better than in water, and biofilms can provide shelter against disinfection. We used a Propella biofilm reactor for studying the survival of Mycobacterium avium, Legionella pneumophila, Escherichia coli, and canine calicivirus (CaCV) (as a surrogate for human norovirus) in drinking water biofilms grown under high-shear turbulent-flow conditions. The numbers of M. avium and L. pneumophila were analyzed with both culture methods and with peptide nucleic acid fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods. Even though the numbers of pathogens in biofilms decreased during the experiments, M. avium and L. pneumophila survived in biofilms for more than 2 to 4 weeks in culturable forms. CaCV was detectable with a reverse transcription-PCR method in biofilms for more than 3 weeks. E. coli was detectable by culture for only 4 days in biofilms and 8 days in water, suggesting that it is a poor indicator of the presence of certain waterborne pathogens. With L. pneumophila and M. avium, culture methods underestimated the numbers of bacteria present compared to the FISH results. This study clearly proved that pathogenic bacteria entering water distribution systems can survive in biofilms for at least several weeks, even under conditions of high-shear turbulent flow, and may be a risk to water consumers. Also, considering the low number of virus particles needed to result in an infection, their extended survival in biofilms must be taken into account as a risk for the consumer.
An outbreak of infections caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 5 was detected in a university hospital, and nosocomial reservoirs of the legionella epidemic were examined. Clinical isolates from two patients who had been affected by the L. pneumophila serogroup 5 outbreak, and from another patient with a legionella infection caused by the same serogroup 3 years later, were compared to L. pneumophila serogroup 5 isolates from the hospital water supply by two molecular methods, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis (RAPD). Genotyping confirmed the epidemiological linkage of the first two patients, and linked their infections with the hospital water supply. The third clinical strain, which was also linked to the hospital water, was very similar to the epidemic strain. Even though the water distribution system was sanitized (superheat and flush sanitation), the epidemic strain was shown to be persisting in the hospital water outlets several years after its initial discovery.
After a nosocomial outbreak caused by Legionella pneumophila serogroup 5, the hospital water distribution system, which was found to be colonized by L. pneumophila serogroups 5 and 6, was decontaminated by the superheat and flush method and by installing an additional heat-shock unit in one of the hot water circuits. This unit exposed the recirculated water to a temperature of 80 degrees C. The efficacy of the decontamination measures was evaluated by monitoring the temperatures and legionella concentrations at different parts of the hot water distribution system. The genetic diversity of the colonizing legionella flora was examined using two genotyping methods: amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis (AFLP) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Selected serogroup 6 strains were also analyzed by sequence-based typing (SBT). The results indicated that long-term eradication of serogroup 5 strains was never achieved. Only one serogroup 6 strain was never isolated after the superheat and flush. In all, according to genetic fingerprints, the diversity of Legionella strains in a hospital water system remains stable over the years regardless of the use of recommended disinfection procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.