Patients under 40 years of age comprise about 5 per cent of the overall breast cancer population. These patients are often considered to have a more aggressive disease and are often treated differently as well. A review was performed of all breast cancer patients reported in the American College of Surgeons Cancer Database from 1998 to 2005. The study cohort included all patients less than 40 years of age. Data collected included stage at time of diagnosis, histologic type, and initial treatment performed. These data were then compared with those of patients age 40 or older. The 70,437 cohort patients identified comprised 5.0 per cent of all breast cancer patients reported. There was a statistically significant difference in stage at the time of presentation: 20 per cent of younger patients presented with advanced disease (stage III or IV) versus 13.5 per cent of older patients. A significantly greater percentage of younger patients also presented with infiltrating ductal carcinoma as opposed to the older population (76.9% vs 67.9%). A significantly greater percentage of young patients was treated with mastectomy when compared with the older population (47.7% vs 36.7%, respectively). This difference persisted even when data were controlled for stage. The younger breast cancer patient presents with more advanced disease, suggesting either a more aggressive disease or a greater delay in diagnosis. Also, at all stages, the young patient tends to be treated more “aggressively” surgically, suggesting that the prevailing concept that breast cancer is a “worse” disease in the young may be directing treatment options and patient choices.

No abstract

Distribution of breast cancer varies widely throughout the United States. The factors that influence this geographic variability have not been completely defined. In addition, though a number of studies look at regional and state-to-state variability, few studies have examined this issue with regard to the nation as a whole. State-specific breast cancer data were available from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base in a series of Benchmark Reports. These data were reviewed and stratified with regard to: age at the time of presentation, race, and stage at the time of presentation. The data were further collected into regional cohorts that corresponded to the United States Census Bureau regions. Statistical analyses were then performed to identify any linked or related variables. A total of 811,652 patients with breast cancer were reported. There was a statistically significant relationship between stage at the time of presentation and census region. The greatest percentage of early-stage disease was recorded in the Northeast and the lowest in the South. There was no significant association between age at presentation and geographic region, but there was a significant relationship between race and stage. The nonwhite subgroup had a greater percentage of patients presenting with advanced-stage disease. Finally, regions with a larger percentage of nonurban population had a higher percentage of later-stage disease at presentation. A relationship exists between the pattern of breast cancer presentation and geographical location within the United States. The Northeast–with the highest percentage of urban areas and white population–reported the highest percentage of early-stage breast cancer at presentation, suggesting a link between these variables. Conversely, the South–with more rural and nonwhite population–had the highest percentage of later-stage disease. The causal relationships are not clear-cut, however, and the relationship between geography and breast cancer presentation is likely multifactorial. Further analysis is indicated to uncover any link between geographic variability and overall breast cancer treatment and survival.

No abstract

In recent years, there has been great interest in the looming shortage of general surgeons. The media has begun to take notice, and politicians are now being forced to answer difficult questions regarding access to emergent surgical care. There are a number of issues which have impacted upon the shortage: physician workforce shortages secondary to the population boom and the inadequate response of medical school enrollment; changes in the mentality of current medical graduates desiring a more "balanced lifestyle" and its impact on specialty selection; subspecialization; the malpractice crisis; and declining reimbursements for surgical procedures. This review examines these issues in depth and suggests several potential solutions to the problem, including the surgical hospitalist model; the integration of trauma with emergency surgery; and tort and legislative reform. Further discussion centers around the responsibilities of both the "system" and the individual general surgeon in dealing with this important crisis.