Background The response of brain metastases (BM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs; programmed cell death 1 and its ligand) is of significant interest. Methods Patients were divided into cohorts based on ICI sequencing around SRS. The primary outcome was best objective response (BOR) that was lesion specific. Secondary outcomes included overall objective response (OOR), response durability, radiation necrosis (RN), and overall survival (OS). Results One hundred fifty patients underwent SRS to 1003 BM and received ICI. Five hundred sixty-four lesions (56%) treated with concurrent ICI (±5 half-lives) demonstrated superior BOR, OOR, and response durability compared with lesions treated with SRS and delayed ICI. Responses were best in those treated with immediate (±1 half-life) ICI (BOR: −100 vs −57%, P < 0.001; complete response: 50 vs 32%; 12-month durable response: 94 vs 71%, P < 0.001). Lesions pre-exposed to ICI and treated with SRS had poorer BOR (−45%) compared with ICI naive lesions (−63%, P < 0.001); best response was observed in ICI naive lesions receiving SRS and immediate ICI (−100%, P < 0.001). The 12-month cumulative incidence of RN with immediate ICI was 3.2% (95% CI: 1.3–5.0%). First radiographic follow-up and best intracranial response were significantly associated with longer OS; steroids were associated with inferior response rates and poorer OS (median 10 vs 25 mo, P = 0.002). Conclusions Sequencing of ICI around SRS is associated with overall response, best response, and response durability, with the most substantial effect in ICI naive BM undergoing immediate combined modality therapy. First intracranial response for patients treated with immediate ICI and SRS may be prognostic for OS, whereas steroids are detrimental.

Molecular subtypes appear to be prognostic for survival and predictive of the response to radiotherapy. TKIs were found to improve survival and local control, and may decrease the rate of distant failure. To preserve neurocognition, these results support a paradigm of upfront radiosurgery and HER2-directed therapy in the HER2-amplified population, reserving whole-brain radiotherapy for salvage. Cancer 2017;123:2283-2293. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants with concerning phenotypic mutations is of public health interest. Genomic surveillance is an important tool for pandemic response, but many laboratories do not have the resources to support population-level sequencing. We hypothesized that a nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) to genotype mutations in the viral spike protein could facilitate high-throughput variant surveillance. We designed and analytically validated a one-step multiplex allele-specific reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) to detect three non-synonymous spike protein mutations (L452R, E484K, N501Y). Assay specificity was validated with next-generation whole-genome sequencing. We then screened a large cohort of SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens from our San Francisco Bay Area population. Between December 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021, we screened 4,049 unique infections by genotyping RT-qPCR, with an assay failure rate of 2.8%. We detected 1,567 L452R mutations (38.7%), 34 N501Y mutations (0.84%), 22 E484K mutations (0.54%), and 3 (0.07%) E484K+N501Y mutations. The assay had perfect (100%) concordance with whole-genome sequencing in a validation subset of 229 specimens, and detected B.1.1.7, B.1.351, B.1.427, B.1.429, B.1.526, and P.2 variants, among others. The assay revealed rapid emergence of L452R in our population, with a prevalence of 24.8% in December 2020 that increased to 62.5% in March 2021. We developed and clinically implemented a genotyping RT-qPCR to conduct high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 variant screening. This approach can be adapted for emerging mutations and immediately implemented in laboratories already performing NAAT worldwide using existing equipment, personnel, and extracted nucleic acid.

Highlights d Antibodies to four COVID-19 vaccines differed in an observational study in Mongolia d Responses from high to low: Pfizer/BioNTech > AstraZeneca > Sputnik V > Sinopharm d Breakthrough infections in June to early July of 2021 were due mostly to the Alpha variant d After breakthrough infection, high antibody levels are seen in all vaccine groups