Objectives
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a vital sub‐population of CD4+ T cells with major roles in immune tolerance and homeostasis. Given such properties, the use of regulatory T cells for immunotherapies has been extensively investigated, with a focus on adoptive transfer of ex vivo expanded natural Tregs (nTregs). For immunotherapies, induced Tregs (iTregs), generated in vitro from naïve CD4+ T cells, provide an attractive alternative, given the ease of generating cell numbers required for clinical dosage. While the combination of TGF‐β, ATRA and rapamycin has been shown to generate highly suppressive iTregs, the challenge for therapeutic iTreg generation has been their instability. Here, we investigate the impact of rapamycin concentrations and α‐CD3/CD28 bead ratios on human iTreg stability.
Methods
We assess iTregs generated with various concentrations of rapamycin and differing ratios of α‐CD3/CD28 beads for their differentiation, stability, expression of Treg signature molecules and T helper effector cytokines, and Treg‐specific demethylation region (TSDR) status.
Results
iTregs generated in the presence of TGF‐β, ATRA, rapamycin and a higher ratio of α‐CD3/CD28 beads were highly suppressive and stable upon in vitro re‐stimulation. These iTregs exhibited a similar expression profile of Treg signature molecules and T helper effector cytokines to nTregs, in the absence of TSDR demethylation.
Conclusion
This work establishes a method to generate human iTregs which maintain stable phenotype and function upon in vitro re‐stimulation. Further validation in pre‐clinical models will be needed to ensure its suitability for applications in adoptive transfer.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.