Abstractobjective Intermittent preventive treatment in infants (IPTi) is a malaria control strategy currently recommended by WHO for implementation at scale in Africa, consisting of administration of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) coupled with routine immunizations offered to children under 1 year.In this study, we analysed IPTi acceptability by communities and health staff.methods Direct observation, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted in Benin, Madagascar and Senegal during IPTi pilot implementation. Villages were stratified by immunization coverage. Data were transcribed and analysed using NVivo7 software.results Communities' knowledge of malaria aetiology and diagnosis was good, although generally villagers did not seek treatment at health centres as their first choice. Perceptions and attitudes towards IPTi were very positive among communities and health workers. A misconception that SP was an antipyretic that prevents post-vaccinal fever contributed to IPTi's acceptability. No refusals or negative rumours related to IPTi coupling with immunizations were identified, and IPTi did not negatively influence attitudes towards other malaria control strategies. Healthcare decisions about children, normatively made by the father, are starting to shift to educated and financially independent mothers.discussion Intermittent preventive treatment in infants is well accepted by providers and communities, showing a synergic acceptability when coupled with routine immunizations. However, a misconception that SP alleviates fever should be addressed when scaling up implementation.
Simultaneous administration of SP-IPTi and immunizations is a safe strategy for implementation with a low risk of serious AEs to infants. Strategies toward strengthening spontaneous reporting in Africa should include not only the provider but also beneficiaries or their caregivers.
BACKGROUND: Obesity and overweight are more common, especially among women of reproductive age. Therefore, the approach to maternal obesity requires a multidisciplinary approach, especially health professionals working in primary care preventive health services.AIM: The aim of the study is to determine the effect of maternal obesity on maternal and newborn health in Al Khansaa Teaching Hospial, City of Mosul, Iraq.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study, which was planned as à case-control study, was conducted in the Al Khansa Teaching Hospital City of Mosul, Iraq.The inclusion criteria included women in postnatal period in the same Hospital, speaking and understanding Arabic, knowing her pre-pregnancy weight, not having any chronic disease (diabetes, hypertension, trioid diseases, etc.) before pregnancy, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) 18.5–25, those with a BMI >29.9, and those with primary school or higher education were included. The exclusion criteria included multiple pregnancies, without any formal education, physical disability (that prevented the completion of the data collection forms), and mental health problems. Data were collected with the data collection form and Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale.RESULTS. The study was completed with 286 women, 142 cases and 144 control groups. There was no statistical difference between the case and control groups in terms of family type and employment status (p>0.050). While the mean age, pregnancy and number of living children of the women in the case group were statistically higher, their educational status was found to be lower (p<0.050). It was found that women with obesity experienced health problems such as urinary tract infection, anemia, gestational diabetes, psychological problems, and preeclampsia/gestational hypertension at a higher rate than women in the control group (p<0.010), and women in the control group gained 13.94±5.29 kg (p=0.001).CONCLUSION In conclusion, it was found that women in the case group experienced pregnancy, early and late postpartum complications at a higher rate than the control group, while there was no difference between the groups in terms of depression at the end of the sixth week postpartum.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.