BackgroundAlirocumab undergoes target‐mediated clearance via binding of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). Statins increase PCSK9 levels; the effects of nonstatin lipid‐lowering therapies are unclear. Every‐4‐weeks dosing of alirocumab may be appropriate for some patients in absence of background statin but is not yet approved.Methods and ResultsLow‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), PCSK9, and alirocumab levels were assessed in subjects (LDL‐C >130 mg/dL, n=24/group) after a 4‐week run‐in taking oral ezetimibe, fenofibrate, or ezetimibe placebo, when alirocumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (days 1, 29, and 57) was added. Maximal mean LDL‐C reductions from day −1 baseline (prealirocumab) occurred on day 71 in all groups: alirocumab plus placebo, 47.4%; alirocumab plus ezetimibe, 56.6%; and alirocumab plus fenofibrate, 54.3%. LDL‐C reductions were sustained through day 85 with alirocumab plus placebo (47.0%); the duration of effect was slightly diminished at day 85 versus day 71 with ezetimibe (49.6%) or fenofibrate combinations (43.2%). Free PCSK9 concentrations were lowest at day 71 in all groups, then increased over time; by day 85, free PCSK9 concentrations were higher, and alirocumab levels lower, with alirocumab plus fenofibrate, and to a lesser extent alirocumab plus ezetimibe, versus alirocumab plus placebo.ConclusionsAlirocumab 150 mg every 4 weeks produced maximal LDL‐C reductions of 47% in combination with placebo and 54% to 57% in combination with ezetimibe or fenofibrate. The oral lipid‐lowering therapies appear to increase PCSK9 levels, leading to increased alirocumab clearance. Although the duration of effect was modestly diminished with alirocumab plus ezetimibe/fenofibrate versus placebo, the effect was less than observed in trials with background statins, and it would not preclude the use of alirocumab every 4 weeks in patients taking these nonstatin lipid‐lowering therapies concomitantly.Clinical Trial Registration
URL: http://www.Clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01723735.
AimsWe investigated the relative pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor alirocumab following injection at three different sites.MethodsSixty healthy subjects (39 male, 21 female; age 20–45 years) were randomized to receive a single subcutaneous injection of alirocumab 75 mg via 1-mL prefilled pen into the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh (NCT01785329). Subjects were followed for 85 days ± 2 days following study drug administration. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for the systemic exposure of alirocumab were calculated, and levels of free PCSK9 were assessed. Percentage changes from baseline in LDL-C were compared between injection site groups using linear mixed-effects models.ResultsAlirocumab concentration–time profiles were similar, and free PCSK9 levels were reduced to approximately zero between Day 3 and Day 4 postinjection in all groups. LDL-C levels reached nadir on Day 15 postinjection in all groups with mean percentage reductions of 48.4% (abdomen), 39.5% (upper arm), and 45.6% (thigh) at this time point. A similar effect on LDL-C levels was seen across the entire time course of the study at all three injection sites. Treatment-emergent adverse events were experienced by 8/20 (abdomen), 11/20 (upper arm), and 13/20 (thigh) subjects. There were 2 mild/transient injection site reactions. There were no serious adverse events.DiscussionA single subcutaneous administration of alirocumab 75 mg via prefilled pen was well tolerated with similar pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics when injected into the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh.ConclusionThese results suggest that alirocumab can be interchangeably injected in the abdomen, upper arm, or thigh.
Quinupristin/dalfopristin (Q/D) is a novel streptogramin antibiotic for the treatment of severe gram-positive infections. The purpose of this open, nonrandomized, parallel-group, phase I trial was to evaluate Q/D pharmacokinetics after single and repeated doses under the two different dosing regimens corresponding to the effective doses and to evaluate tolerability. Two groups of 10 healthy volunteers received multiple 1-hour intravenous infusions of 7.5 mg/kg Q/D either every 8 or 12 hours for 4 or 5 days, respectively. Plasma concentrations of Q, D, and metabolites were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography and selective microbiological assays. The two regimens q8h and q12h lead to the same disposition profile after single and repeated administration. Single-dose data confirmed the high plasma clearances of Q and D (about 0.90 l/h/kg) obtained previously. Unchanged drugs were the main components in plasma, with each of the three metabolites representing about 20% (in terms of the AUC ratio) of the parent drugs. Comparable steady-state concentrations were reached from day 2 of both regimens. A similar moderate increase in Cmax and AUC (about 20%) of parent drugs was observed between the first and last day of treatment. This phenomenon, which was also observed for the metabolites, was not expected considering the short terminal disposition half-lives of the parent drugs and trough plasma concentrations of all components mostly below the limits of quantitation at steady state, whatever the dosing regimen. The clearances of parent drugs at steady state were about 20% lower as compared with that observed following the first drug administration (statistically significant difference). No trend suggesting a treatment effect on any laboratory parameter, vital signs, or electrocardiographic parameters was identified. However, 80% of subjects reported venous adverse events probably related to treatment.
These results suggest that no formal reduction in the dosage of quinupristin/dalfopristin is necessary in patients with severe chronic renal impairment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.