This article explained the legal risk as a part of good governance due to risk mitigation agency will be reviewed and then described descriptively with the role of State-Owned Enterprises related to climate change issues. State-Owned Enterprises should have a unit to hire risk management included the legal risk. The standard risk significant to guarantee the sustainable role of State-Owned Enterprises as a legal entity that gets the capital from the State and will require climate change issues. By doctrinal legal research, this article described the main problems for the implementation due to the category of risk State-Owned Enterprises. This article concluded: (i) State-Owned Enterprises already has mitigation that can respond to internal risks but are not sufficient to adapt to the issue of climate change; and (ii) the role of State-Owned Enterprises in responding to climate change needs support from the government.

Une bonne partie de !'opinion a été frapp ée de constater comment se sont termin ées les récentes gr èves du Borinage. Le gouvernement avait réuni les représ entan ts des organisations patronales et ceux d es or ganisations ou vrières. Aux uns et aux autres , il avait fait des propositions ; il prenait, notamment, !' engagem ent d ' assurer Ie remploi de la main-d'ceuvre rendue disponible par la fermeture des puits. Ses effor ts n ' aboutissant pas, les ministres avaient quitté la séance.

This article aims to clarify that there are several elements critical for ensuring the efficacy of law. The view of efficacy that emphasizes the objective and comply with the law is narrow and inadequate. New insights and understanding are required to strengthen the realization of the concept of the efficacy of law. The COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia forms a background to understand the efficacy of law. The study uses a socio-legal approach based on Indonesian experience in preventing the spread of COVID-19 through law reform. The government enacted at least 188 new regulations regarding the public health system, restrictions on activities in public spaces, and national economic recovery to manage the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The first wave of the viral infection showed that the existing regulations failed to meet their objectives. The regulations that prohibited social activities led to economic disincentives within the society. In addition, these workers could not access the social security program. The regulations restricted their work activities and, in turn, affected their compliance with the law and its enforcement power. New ways are needed to solve problems that constitute unexpected impacts of the COVID-19 prevention regulations.