Background informationCellular prion protein (PrPC) is infamous for its role in prion diseases. The physiological function of PrPC remains enigmatic, but several studies point to its involvement in cell differentiation processes. To test this possibility, we monitored PrPC changes during the differentiation of prion‐susceptible CAD 5 cells, and then we analysed the effect of PrPC ablation on the differentiation process.ResultsNeuronal CAD 5 cells differentiate within 5 days of serum withdrawal, with the majority of the cells developing long neurites. This process is accompanied by an up to sixfold increase in PrPC expression and enhanced N‐terminal β‐cleavage of the protein, which suggests a role for the PrPC in the differentiation process. Moreover, the majority of PrPC in differentiated cells is inside the cell, and a large proportion of the protein does not associate with membrane lipid rafts. In contrast, PrPC in proliferating cells is found mostly on the cytoplasmic membrane and is predominantly associated with lipid rafts. To determine the importance of PrPC in cell differentiation, a CAD 5 PrP−/− cell line with ablated PrPC expression was created using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. We observed no considerable difference in morphology, proliferation rate or expression of molecular markers between CAD 5 and CAD 5 PrP−/− cells during the differentiation initiated by serum withdrawal.ConclusionsPrPC characteristics, such as cell localisation, level of expression and posttranslational modifications, change during CAD 5 cell differentiation, but PrPC ablation does not change the course of the differentiation process.SignificanceAblation of PrPC expression does not affect CAD 5 cell differentiation, although we observed many intriguing changes in PrPC features during the process. Our study does not support the concept that PrPC is important for neuronal cell differentiation, at least in simple in vitro conditions.

The number of people living with multiple sclerosis (MS) in developed countries is increasing. The management of patients is hindered by the absence of reliable laboratory tests accurately reflecting the disease activity. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) of different cell origin were reportedly elevated in MS patients. We assessed the diagnostic potential, with flow cytometry analysis, of fresh large EVs (lEVs), which scattered more light than the 590 nm silica beads and were isolated from the blood plasma of relapsing remitting MS patients. Venous blood was collected from 15 patients and 16 healthy controls (HC). The lEVs were isolated from fresh platelet-free plasma by centrifugation, labelled with antibodies and the presence of platelet (CD41+, CD36+), endothelial (CD105+), erythrocyte (CD235a+), leukocyte (CD45+, CD19+, CD3+) and phosphatidylserine (Annexin V+) positive lEVs was analyzed using standard flow cytometry. Cryo-electron microscopy was used to verify the presence of EVs in the analyzed plasma fractions. MS patients experiencing acute relapse had slightly reduced relative levels (% of positive lEVs) of CD105+, CD45+, CD3+, CD45+CD3+ or CD19+ labelled lEVs in comparison to healthy controls. An analysis of other markers or a comparison of absolute lEV counts (count of lEVs/µL) did not yield any significant differences. Our data do not support the hypothesis that the exacerbation of the disease in RRMS patients leads to an increased numbers of circulating plasma lEVs which can be monitored by standard flow cytometry.

Different biomarkers are investigated to detect the causes of severe complications in preterm infants. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are recognized as an important part of cell-to-cell communication, and their increased levels were reported in numerous pathological states. We aimed to increase our knowledge about the incidence of platelet and endothelial EVs in cord blood of preterm newborns using conventional flow cytometry. The presence of platelet (CD36+CD41+), activated platelet (CD41+CD62+), and endothelial (CD31+CD105+) EVs was analyzed. Immune electron microscopy was used to confirm the presence of EVs and the specificity of their labeling. The size of detected extracellular vesicles was in the range 400–2000 nm. The differences in the counts of EVs between the preterm and control group were not significant and no correlation of EVs count with gestation age was recorded. Cord blood plasma samples with free hemoglobin level > 1 mg/mL had more than threefold higher counts of CD36+CD41+ and CD41+CD62+ EVs (p < 0.001), while the count of CD31+CD105+ EVs was only moderately increased (p < 0.05). Further studies utilizing cytometers with improved sensitivity are needed to confirm that the analysis of large platelet and endothelial EVs mirrors the quantitative situation of their whole plasma assemblage.

Prions are responsible for a number of lethal neurodegenerative and transmissible diseases in humans and animals. Extracellular vesicles, especially small exosomes, have been extensively studied in connection with various diseases. In contrast, larger microvesicles are often overlooked. In this work, we compared the ability of large extracellular vesicles (lEVs) and small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) to spread prions in cell culture. We utilized two cell culture models of prion infection and isolated lEVs by 20,000 × g force and sEVs by 110,000 × g force. The lEV fraction was enriched in β-1 integrin with a vesicle size starting at 150 nm. The fraction of sEVs was depleted of β-1 integrin with a mean size of 79 nm. Both fractions were enriched in prion protein, but the lEVs contained a higher prion-converting activity. In addition, lEV infection led to stronger prion signals in both cell cultures, as detected by cell and western blotting. Our data suggest the importance of lEVs in the trafficking and spread of prions over extensively studied small EVs.